Forum Replies Created

Page 95 of 258
  • Charlie Austin

    September 21, 2014 at 9:04 pm in reply to: I Found my new favorite NLE. And it’s free!

    [Kirk Pitts] “Still like the options for export in QT7. When those are in QT X then I’ll no longer need 7.”

    It may be a long wait. Like.. eternity. 🙂 All the “pro” export functions now require compressor. Again, a send to Compressor menu choice, or Compressor service would be nice. Send feedback, I have. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 21, 2014 at 6:02 pm in reply to: I Found my new favorite NLE. And it’s free!

    [Bret Williams] “I guess my point was many think all you can do is open a file and view it in QTX. When in fact you can edit (much better than 7),”

    That was kind of why I made this. I had messed with it a little, but after the “dialog editing is really hard in fcp x” (it’s not) comments the other day I thought I’d see how it was in the QT player. lol Turns out It’s not bad, though scrubbing audio would be a welcome feature.

    [Bret Williams] ” and convert to mov”

    Actually, a “send to compressor” option in the share/export menu would also be a nice addition…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 21, 2014 at 5:05 pm in reply to: I Found my new favorite NLE. And it’s free!

    [Andreas Kiel] “????
    All of that you can do with QT7 and even more.
    “

    Agree about “even more” QT 10 has no properties editor, a/v panel, etc. You’d need 3rd party apps for that stuff if you don’t have QT 7. However, QT has way more capable editing tools, which are likely what most people need. Kinda like FCP 7 vs X. 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [Aindreas Gallagher] “well they haven’t been shown an apple gold phone quite yet.”

    True. But I’m pretty sure that if Apple made a solid gold, $10,000 phone tomorrow it wouldn’t change the demand for the $650 to $850 (unsubsidized cost) versions. At all.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [Aindreas Gallagher] “no personally. i rather think this is say more the fcpx reveal: it actually is what it is”

    Well, that’s fine then. FCP X kicks ass. 🙂 Again, we’ll see.

    [Aindreas Gallagher] “as in it feels a largely stupid superfluous object with its tongue laid out to the overtly wealthy to the exclusion of broad american society.”

    I’d agree if all they were making was the gold watch. But that’s not all they’re making at all is it? The Sport version is no more exclusive than an iPhone. They’re relatively expensive as phones go. Yet broad american society seems to be quite able, and willing, to attain them.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [Aindreas Gallagher] “what do you actually think of the make up?”

    I do understand what you’re saying, but I honestly don’t think it’s some big shift. Ahrendts came in to revamp retail. The luxury guy probably did come in to ramp up the watch stuff. I just don’t think any of this portends a big sea change. They just want in an a new market, and they intend to own it. We’ll see if it works I guess.

    Removing pro apps from the blurb doesn’t worry me either. I think the line between Pro and Not Pro Apps is becoming veerry blurry anyway. You can cut youtube cat videos and feature films on FCP X. It’s neither Pro nor Amateur. It’s an app that anyone, at any level can use. Again… we’ll see. Maybe they’ll switch the Texas Mac Pro line over to watches. 😉

    EDIT: I also think there’s a lot more to the watches than what they’ve talked about. I think the reveal was all about preventing leaks. They’ve said “here it is!”. They can’t lock down the manufacturers and prevent leaks. The software is another story… We really don’t know exactly what it’s gonna do…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [Aindreas Gallagher] “half interesting surely. Burberry is currently at the right hand of luxury CEO God. Even Ive is on the second floor.

    at the lower level paul deneve is first among equals.”

    Or, after Cook they could just be listed alphabetically. Nah… too simple. Also, Ahrendts is to Cooks left. Gotta be a message there somewhere. 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 18, 2014 at 7:39 pm in reply to: Apple’s Corporate Definition Part Deux

    [Aindreas Gallagher] “And they made a five thousand dollar one in gold.

    misgivings, super unavoidable misgivings.”

    Well, there’s always this take:

    You’ll be able to buy one at the Apple Store but I’ll tell you right now it will never be in stock and will have to be a special order. Gold Apple Watches will instead be sold in the same stores as those other fine watches. That’s why Apple hired Monsieur Pruniaux.

    Apple gets a new, small (but highly lucrative) sales channel that is perfectly happy holding inventory. And if they sell Apple Watches the watch retailers will probably sell iPhones to go with them.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 18, 2014 at 3:08 pm in reply to: PP to FCPX any experiences?

    [David Powell] ” Am I asking for big trouble? I don’t mind a bit of cleanup.”

    It works OK, pretty much like going from 7 to X. Not sure about multicam,

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [TImothy Auld] “You may list anything as you like. My present clients have delivery requirements. Do yours?”

    Yes

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

Page 95 of 258

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy