Forum Replies Created

Page 29 of 258
  • Charlie Austin

    March 3, 2016 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Heckling Opportunity! Saturday!

    [Mark Smith] “Is there going to be a video or a podcast of your talk? I’m always interested in what you have to say.”

    I think they post stuff… I’m interested in what I have to say too!. I only have around 20 minutes or so, and there’s a whole lot I could talk aboutt. lol Maybe I’ll just take questions… 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    March 3, 2016 at 2:00 am in reply to: Heckling Opportunity! Saturday!

    [Andrew Kimery] “Too short notice for me, otherwise I’d be there with rotten tomatoes ready to hurl. ;)”

    Bummer… Hopefully someone else will bring fruit. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    March 3, 2016 at 1:59 am in reply to: Heckling Opportunity! Saturday!

    [David Roth Weiss] “Hey Charlie,

    If you need some support I hear Chris Christie is available.”

    lol… Nah, I think I’m good. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    March 3, 2016 at 1:59 am in reply to: Heckling Opportunity! Saturday!

    [Shane Ross] “Say “hi” to David Tillman (editor of the Challenger doc) for me.”

    Will do. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    March 3, 2016 at 1:58 am in reply to: Heckling Opportunity! Saturday!

    [Bill Davis] “Then again, I’ll probably be interested in what you’re saying. So maybe I’ll just sit quietly and listen. ; )”

    No… I need heckling! 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    March 2, 2016 at 11:50 pm in reply to: FCPX rookie question

    Short answer is… yes. 🙂 Can you post the specs?

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    March 2, 2016 at 4:13 am in reply to: Game of Thrones London Trailer workflow in X.

    [Simon Ubsdell] “However, it remains that the X2Pro export didn’t work for the audio – which should be a matter for concern”

    FWIW, it’s not X2Pro in this case, it’s Media Composer. Until 8.5, more than 16 tracks would cause problems, but the real issue is that -even coming from ProTools – you have to “quantatize to frame boundaries” for an AAF to work at all. X2Pro doesn’t do this and, since X will have lots of edits on subframes, Media Composer won’t open it. Could Marquis fix it? Maybe, but their focus is ProTools and other DAW’s, which happily accept the AAF’s.

    I’ve heard of random X2Pro issues but – and this is anecdote rather than data – I’ve never had a problem sending X2Pro AAF’s to mixes… They’re usually very happy with the prep… split out properly, all tracks named etc.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 26, 2016 at 8:43 am in reply to: Hail Caesar

    [Oliver Peters] “And from the other guys :)”

    You mean Adobe? Those guys? You’ll note Tim’s piece was not written by, or commissioned by Apple. It was written by, um… Tim. 🙂 Pretty unbiased author I’d say.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 26, 2016 at 8:39 am in reply to: Hail Caesar

    [Claude Lyneis] “I am happy with X but whether it will ever have much impact on Hollywood is a big question.”

    Have a look at Tim’s WTF article.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 18, 2016 at 11:55 pm in reply to: Force relink

    [Jeremy Garchow] “The duration of your clip is 1m54s26f assuming the format of the clip is indeed 29.97 ndf”

    I’m sure you’re correct, I can “read” XML, but the timing part of it really is gibberish to me. I was just idly speculating, as I often do… 🙂 I’m curious as to why it doesn’t/couldn’t/wouldn’t work too…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

Page 29 of 258

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy