Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 8
  • Arc Nevada

    October 10, 2009 at 1:30 am in reply to: Matrox Uber Alles???

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj0JoFxoOyo

    Tim have you watched my video above? I am indeed editing AVCHD and HDV using a converter box. It is not a DV-25 timeline either. I can do it with a P2 timeline or even an AVCHD timeline. I am not sure what you mean by editing DV? I am not sure how much more HD you want then AVCHD or HDV 1440 X 1080? I admit it would look better on a 16:9 LCD monitor. The conveter box has has enough resolution (720×480) for the image to look very crisp and clean on an HD monitor(not true HD). I also usauly edit in draft mode any way (not true HD). The converter box works great for me. I admit a a Decklink card would be better but your assumption of only editing DV-25 using a converter box is incorrect. I would not have mentioed it if that were the case.

    Buck could just use his video cards HDMI/DVI out to connect to an HD monitor as well.

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Arc Nevada

    October 8, 2009 at 11:56 pm in reply to: Matrox Uber Alles???

    You might find a DV converter from Canopus might have worked out OK for a laptop. I hear you load an clear about proprietary codecs. I used to use a Canopus DV Storm. Only the Canopus effects were real time. They were not bad but you were using a plugin GUI rather than the Premiere Pro GUI.

    If you have a 30 day trial buy the Canopus ADVC 110 DV converter and compare the two. I use a cheap ADS PYRO but the Canopus DV Coverter is better.

    https://desktop.grassvalley.com/products/ADVC110/index.php

  • Arc Nevada

    October 8, 2009 at 9:50 am in reply to: “Best” board for editing

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj0JoFxoOyo

    The video above uses a DV converter and the video below just uses two computer monitors. I just use a 2.66 GHZ Core 2 Quad (Yorfield) with a mere 4 GIGS of RAM. I used to use a Canopus DV Storm back when the Pentium 4 at 2. 4 GHZ was consider fast. With the invention of the Quad Core CPU accelrators cards have now become obsolete for the most part. I admit a Decklink card would be better than my converter box.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGdvmjDB3HE

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Arc Nevada

    October 8, 2009 at 9:38 am in reply to: real time playback

    It should, but keep in mimd uncompressed HD is about 120 MB per second. If you want multiple layers of uncompressed HD you might want to RAID at least 6 hard drives together.

    You can also customize an uncompressed timeline.

  • Arc Nevada

    October 8, 2009 at 3:40 am in reply to: External Monitor Options???

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj0JoFxoOyo

    Above is my system with a Fire Wire DV converter. Below is my system with dual computer monitors.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGdvmjDB3HE

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Arc Nevada

    September 20, 2009 at 1:21 am in reply to: Cineform NEOHD or PROSPECT HD?

    I think CS3 did have more realtime than CS4. I agree with you on that point.

    The Panasonic P2 codec is better than HDV.

  • Arc Nevada

    September 19, 2009 at 6:46 pm in reply to: Cineform NEOHD or PROSPECT HD?

    Tim Kolb,
    Tim Kolb,

    I am not sure what point you are trying to make. He stated he has a Quad Core with CS4. He is not using a Pentium 4 and Premiere 6.5. I know the Cineform codec was usefull for HD editing 5 years ago but any Qaud Core should handle HDV OK. I think we can agree on that.

    One thing that did pop into my head after your post is that CS4 does work better with Vista than XP. XP should work just not as good as Vista when using PP CS4. I think XP may be bottle neck.

    I still don’t think Cineform is going to help a trashed Quad Core. Perhaps it was just a bad Premiere install. I does happen.

    I thought about getting the Cineform myself but after buying a Quad Core I realize there is no need (thanks Adobe). Quad Cores rock!

  • Arc Nevada

    September 19, 2009 at 12:33 am in reply to: Cineform NEOHD or PROSPECT HD?

    Nathan,

    I don’t think Cinform NEO is going to help you out at all. If the system you use is trashed then the system is trashed. Below are a few examples of how PP CS4 handles native HDV. Like Editing DV-25 or Mini DV on a Pentium D.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj0JoFxoOyo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGdvmjDB3HE

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Arc Nevada

    September 17, 2009 at 11:55 pm in reply to: Cineform NEOHD or PROSPECT HD?

    I agree with David. Editing HDV on an inexpensive Quad Core is like editing DV-25 on a Pentium D. Even AVCHD edits OK if you do not use any effects. I don’t see the need for the Cineform code when using Premiere.

  • Arc Nevada

    September 15, 2009 at 11:51 pm in reply to: Preview Resolution

    In high quality it plays at full resolution. In draft quality it plays DV-25 at half resolution and HD footage a quarter resolution.

    The info is in the manual.

Page 3 of 8

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy