Forum Replies Created

Page 16 of 25
  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 10:14 pm in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    Makes sense. Thanks Daniel.

    I hate to resurrect this thread, so give me a yes or no answer, but do you have any idea why I wouldn’t be able to encode x264 with MP4 container in Squeeze? I can do x264 with QT…

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 10:11 pm in reply to: Bitrate for Playback from Data Disc

    I won’t be using QT for the exports, but on a related note, in the Data Rate area on the QT export dialog what does the optimize for CD/DVD do?

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 10:06 pm in reply to: Tips on QT Reference Movies for Web/Mobile?

    Not for this scenario, but it looks like I could use that in the future. Thanks.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 9:00 pm in reply to: Custom codec for Apple /FCP Compressor

    I’m not sure I understand your problem 100%, but if it’s merely an issue of getting the droplet to work, it’s basically just a mini app. Drag the master file into the droplet to open and run the encode. I like to work with them stashed in my dock for a quick drag-and-drop encode.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 7:43 pm in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    Keyframe every 300. Still doesn’t like the fade at the end.

    I may be hitting a brick wall with this now and stick to the Sorenson encoder until I find a solution.

    I don’t want to use anymore of your time Daniel, but can you explain why VLC and QT show me totally different frames when playing back the same clip? I assume they have different decoders, but which is “correct”. QT displays what I think I should see, but VLC displays a mess. I tried uploading a portion of the clip (spot hasn’t aired yet) to the COW uploader, but the frames it displays are seconds off.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 6:21 pm in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    I agree, the MC encode should look better, at least according to what I’ve read. I recall reading that article awhile I ago; I think I found it on one of your posts.

    I ran some more tests with many variation on the Main Concept encoder. It really only seems to struggle at then end with the fade to black.

    I’ll describe the settings (variations only) in these two screenshots in the order of top left, top middle, top right, bottom left, etc.

    The top left is the Apple encoder, and the others are the MC encoder.

    • Apple Encode (same as before, except enable multi-pass)
    • MC Encode (same as before)
    • MC Encode – Keyframe every 60 no auto scene change
    • MC Encode – Keyframe every 100 auto to 85 frequency
    • MC Encode – Keyframe every 100 auto to 50 frequency
    • MC Encode – Keyframe every 100 no auto scene change

    In retrospect, I may not have varied the keyframe and auto-kf rates enough to show much of a difference. All files weigh in at 4.9MB. (these are iPhone/Pod encodes)

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 12:54 am in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    Sorry, maybe I wasn’t clear. If you look at the last two posts, you’ll see the encode setting in the file name at the top of the player window.

    MC has been on the top and Apple on the bottom.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 12:33 am in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    Here is a redo of the above screen shot without any scrubbing involved in playback. Main Concept on top, Apple on bottom.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 12:14 am in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    Maybe I should wait until I’m done testing to post, haha.

    So Sorenson encoded version will let me scrub and skip back and forth without any issues as will the x.264 encode.

    The Apple and Main Concept encodes to not, and the extreme artifacting is introduced.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

  • Andrew Saliga

    December 2, 2009 at 12:06 am in reply to: H.264 Encoder Comparisons

    I’m not sure what it is, but when I scrub through a clip in VLC it gets that extreme artifacting. It’s not nearly as bad when it’s played back.

    -Andrew Saliga

    Steelehouse Productions
    http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
    http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse

Page 16 of 25

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy