Forum Replies Created

Page 55 of 139
  • Aaron Neitz

    January 23, 2008 at 8:05 pm in reply to: Reconform based on Timecode?

    Thanks Martin, that’s exactly what I thought.

    Luckily FCP is such a fast editor that hand conforming cutdowns isn’t very hard

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 23, 2008 at 7:29 pm in reply to: Reconform based on Timecode?

    Sorry for the fuzion:

    1)Onlining a music video in HD. Editor sends me his project file over email.

    2) MM and make a project with 1sec handles

    3) Batch conform clips from HDCAM-SR

    4) Several days later they create :60 and :90 cutdowns

    5) editor emails sends me new project file

    6) MM the 60 and 90 timelines

    7) FCP doesn’t seem to have any way to cross reference the clips from the 4 minute timeline with these new 60 and 90’s. What what “reel2 1” from my original capture isn’t the same clip as “reel2 1” from these new timelines. Follow? Since FCP names clips based on the original clip name plus ascending numbers.

    Also FCP seems to reconnect clips based on duration IN from the start of a QT file. Not the actual timecode. [I may be completely wrong on this point, but this is what i seem to observe]. And since my cutdowns have shorter clips, when I point FCP to reconnect to a QT it comes up what “media duration, IN/OUT are different, Continue?” And it puts the clip in at the wrong point.

    If I’m completely off my rocker and there’s a way to do this, I would pay you in a lifetime of donuts.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 23, 2008 at 5:37 pm in reply to: Reconform based on Timecode?

    The problem arises when you have hundreds of clips. It become a hunt and peck match, leaving a lot of room for human mistake.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 23, 2008 at 1:26 am in reply to: Faster color correcting in FCP

    It’s not the fastest I’ll give you that.

    You CAN save a favorite color correction setup by dragging the little “hand w/a clip” icon over into your bins. Have 8 of those and drag them onto clips as you go.

    as far as keyboard – I don’t think so.

    Lag to Kona – yep, it lags for me too.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 22, 2008 at 11:57 pm in reply to: Reconform based on Timecode?

    I’ll have to test later, getting busy but:

    the original capture was from a CMX EDL. Not a MMed project. would this cause probs?

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 22, 2008 at 10:06 pm in reply to: Reconform based on Timecode?

    Well the file names don’t match. That is, in the 3 minute piece you have “ree12 1” “reel2 2” “reel2 3” clip names. So a unique name from each clip.

    But in the :60 cutdown maybe we only use the second shot, but it gets named “reel2 1” by FCP, since it’s the first reel2 shot in the cut.

    Dig?

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 22, 2008 at 6:48 pm in reply to: Title 3D weirdness

    How many fonts do you have active? Cull them down in font book to a hundred or so that you always need, should speed Boris up

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 21, 2008 at 9:05 pm in reply to: interlacing third and last try

    Well the skinny is yes, FCP doesn’t know what to do with interlace. It’s always a mess. And it doesn’t know what to do with 480 vs 486 either.

    Now are you actually loading these DVD’s progressive? Like 30p? Or are they 29.97 with 3:2 pulldown?

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 21, 2008 at 7:36 pm in reply to: Offline clips VS recaptured media. TC MISMATCH!!

    Typically when I see 00 timecode, it means it came from a rendered Quicktime file, not a tape.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 21, 2008 at 7:23 pm in reply to: Need Help

    oh yes. FCP 6 has MASSIVE problems in that area. No known workarounds for me… I just try to avoid it.

Page 55 of 139

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy