Forum Replies Created

Page 122 of 139
  • Aaron Neitz

    January 18, 2006 at 5:14 pm in reply to: FCP render files

    We’ve had a rash of this problem since putting FCP on an XSAN. Sometimes you’ll be editing, and then POOF, “render file missing.” Nothing major, and it’s not predictable, but it makes you nervious as heck.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 17, 2006 at 10:14 pm in reply to: I am DESPERATE for expertise. PLEASE HELP!

    Not sure of your hardware – but try loading your tape into FCP with a DV deck that has SDI out – capture at 10bit Uncompressed. Sometimes the hardware upsampling to SDI will help smooth out the edges and get you a better key. But, end of day, there will be a lot of roto.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 16, 2006 at 10:47 pm in reply to: storage solutions for tons of media

    Lacie are terrible. We’ve had 2 of their 500Gig drives die on us – and others in this forum have also had problems with them. G-Raid makes a great product in firewire land…

    But with the amount of data you seem to have, it might be worth looking into a Xsan/Xraid formatted with RAID-5 protection. Or perhaps a Huge Media Vault RAID setup.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 11, 2006 at 4:56 pm in reply to: Do they chop off action safe for HD?

    It looks like SD spots on an HD channel have full, or at least 95% full raster. This was my scientific evaluation looking closely at where titles and text were placed in the spots 🙂

    Also, regular SD channels are uprezed by my Motorola digital cable HD box to 1080i, and it appears it also put the 4:3 at full raster (with side letterbox).

    So action safe really isn’t so safe anymore.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 7, 2006 at 12:57 am in reply to: The ‘American TV Look’

    That’s true. After a couple days in the UK you kind of stop fixating on that annoying flicker. And it does have better resolution.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 7, 2006 at 12:45 am in reply to: FCP and sluggish response

    Yes, that is our thinking. Will give it a try when we all break for the weekend. thanks!

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 6, 2006 at 10:40 pm in reply to: The ‘American TV Look’

    oops, I mean shooting PROGRESSIVE makes it look BETTER!

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 6, 2006 at 10:38 pm in reply to: The ‘American TV Look’

    the 50 field refreshes per second in PAL is not quite enough to continually fool the eye that it’s a solid picture. The 60 fields/sec in NTSC help overcome that ‘flickery’ quality you get in PAL. Also, yes, shooting a progressive format (like film, or a video camera with a progressive mode) will always yield a home camcorder look – a lot of UK shows seem to be shot on regular video. Way before colorspace, I notice frames/fields first.

  • Aaron Neitz

    January 3, 2006 at 8:59 pm in reply to: KONA SD in a Dual 2.0 GHz G5 HELP!!!!!

    Try putting the card in a slower PCI slot. Like #3. When I put my SD into the 133 slot, it freaked out kinda like what you’re seeing.

  • Aaron Neitz

    December 19, 2005 at 10:50 pm in reply to: 24p advanced and EDLS

    Oh, yeah. If you turn on Timecode Overlays, you should see your source footage displaying a 30fps style timecode – only it will skip frames every now and then. So that way your 24p sequence still has a relationship to the tape, so you *could* batch-digitize it at a later date.

Page 122 of 139

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy