Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › i invite discusion: does apple know about these “issues”
-
i invite discusion: does apple know about these “issues”
Martin Baker replied 20 years, 3 months ago 21 Members · 66 Replies
-
Sean Oneil
April 21, 2006 at 6:35 pmPeople can argue over what the best way is until the cows come home. But adding more options in the User Preferences to allow the individual the choice doesn’t hurt anyone. This is a pro application. They should never be concerned with having too many options in the prefences for fear that it may look too intimidating.
Sean
-
Misha Aranyshev
April 21, 2006 at 6:36 pm[dave kulawick] “Hmmm, is it Apples mis-understanding of this that explains why I’ve never heard of anyone doing a successful insert edit into a tape from FCP? discreet edit* got this right, BTW.”
There is too much bull in this tread to deal with all of it but I’ve done a few successful insert edits from FCP. Starting with version 1.2.5
-
Dave Kulawick
April 21, 2006 at 6:58 pmIt’s true, there does seem to be altogether too much passion about some of this stuff. I don’t want to add to the pile; can you please tell me the hardware setup, ie Mac system, OS version, FCP version, and I/O and hardware card that would allow me to do a frame accurate insert edit into a Betacam SP VTR.
Thanks
dbk
-
Misha Aranyshev
April 21, 2006 at 7:49 pmPowerMac G4 2X1GHz Quicksilver
CineWave
Keyspan 28USAX
FCP 3.0 through 4.5
Mac OS 9 through Mac OS X 10.3.9
Kramer SG6005 BBG
BVW-70P, DVW-A500P,MSW-M2000P, DVW-M2000PActually it doesn’t matter. Any IO hardware with any serial port works.
-
Chris Reynolds
April 22, 2006 at 7:46 amWHAT KEY STROKEs WOULD IT ADD. NONE!!! I ony have two word to say EDIT* and Lightworks both have the out as and out. Not one frame later. They are also the two best editing systems I have ever cut on. I have worn out my arrow back key!!!
Chris.
Applying for a programing job at apple so I can change this myself.
-
Patrick Sheffield
April 22, 2006 at 9:44 amAgain – emulating the tape based systems they were wooing editors away from…
Patrick

-
Martin Baker
April 22, 2006 at 9:08 pmI’m not sure you’d find too many people who would agree with you Sean. There is always a balance to be struck between customisability and complexity and I reckon FCP has it about right at the moment.
Having said that…just one more option won’t hurt and I would totally agree that the Change Speed window could benefit from a “Lock to current sequence duration” button. In the 3 years I’ve been editing on FCP, I can’t think of a single time where I’ve wanted to lock the source in/out and have the sequence out ripple when I change a clip’s speed.
Martin
Digital Heaven, London UK
________________________________________
AutoMotion – 0-60 graphics in 5.2 seconds – Now Shipping -
Sean Oneil
April 24, 2006 at 7:36 am[Martin Baker] ”
I’m not sure you’d find too many people who would agree with you Sean. There is always a balance to be struck between customisability and complexity and I reckon FCP has it about right at the moment.”I can’t accept that argument. How about one more option called an “Advanced Settings” button that has a whole list of custom settings? If you don’t want to click on it, don’t.
Sean
-
Alex Hawkins
April 24, 2006 at 1:20 pm[dave kulawick] “discreet edit* got this right, BTW.”
Indeed they did.
Alex Hawkins
Canberra, Australia -
Eric Susch
April 24, 2006 at 4:35 pmBob,
I’m with ya 100% with the out point thing! It’s my #1 pet-peeve of all software in the entire world! If I ever meet Steve Jobs it’s going to be the first thing I complain about!
I’ve had this discussion several times here and elsewhere and other than the odd FCP zealot whose ego can’t tolerate even the discussion of potential change, most users see the value of what you (and I ) are describing and hate constantly banging back one frame to set an outpoint.
One of the problems with the issue is that it’s very difficult to describe in words, yet the resolution is quite simple. The best way I have come up with to describe it is that the CUT should always be placed where the CURSOR is. This avoids the circular discussion about which frame on which side of the cursor should show in the viewer and why you would or would not want that. It should also avoid getting into old “obsolete” tape editing (3 point editing anyone?) and/or film editing (which is irrelevant because the Moviola doesn’t determine where the grease pencil goes.)
The in or out CUT should always be placed where the CURSOR is. It
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up