-
i invite discusion: does apple know about these “issues”
hey
after using this program for a coupe of months, and stumbling around, and making mistakes, i think i am fairly confident that i can seperate operator error from design flaw, bug, or room for improvement so i wanted to taek a minute to post some observations if nothing else to get a sense of reality, but mainly to find out if anyone else has either found these things and or if apple knows (because someone here has their ear)
1. slo mo; i agree with the logic of changing the clip duration based on speed, but that should be an option, not de riguer. other products address this
2. motion tab: if i am setting a keyframe on a clip, why is it so easy to lose place and wind up way down the timeline? ok i may have to set a keyframe beyond my clip length, but it would be a lot easier if ihad the option to limit my range to just the single clip (ironically, i cant see the clip when i set the parameter outside the clip length, cuz its no longer there)
3. invisible frames: there are situations when for what ever reason there are single frame remnants of clips in the timeline but they are invisible. you can usually tell they are there when you try and put a transtion in and its only one frame long. lets fix the gui, guys
4. option to ignore transisions on cut and paste: either include em, or leave em out, but stop with the error message “cannot perform this action as it would split a transition” i dont really care, i just want to copy the clip
5. mark out includes an extra frame; please make it an option to include or exlude the frame AFTER the outpoint. everytime i mark out i have to backspace one frame first (except when i mark clip in out)
6. give the paste attributes dialog keyboard shortcuts too! if i want to paste a filter only, it would be nice to have it be like a keystroke combo
7. add composite mode to paste attributes menu; i cant paste the way my clip composites, whether it be add or multiply or waht ever i have to set it each time
8 one more thing, and its just an idea: wouldnt it be nice to have a dedicated control surface specifically made for FCP? all the keyboard shortcuts are mapped to dedicated buttons? so you have one button per function instead of “the claw”? i would not eliminate the qwerty, but add this surface to it. based on the number of systems out there, i would think it would make someone some money
thats enough from me, what do you think?
bee eph
Bob Flood
Greer & Associates, Inc.