Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Does anyone think FCPX is NOT a Professional NLE?

  • Andrew Kimery

    October 29, 2015 at 5:10 am

    [Jeremy Garchow] “Obviously, FCP is entirely too professional to be on the very consumer and hardware centric apple.com homepage.”

    As I quipped in a previous post, Apple just knows that pros are diligent enough that they’ll keep going until they find what they need. 😉

  • Oliver Peters

    October 29, 2015 at 12:24 pm

    At the risk of tossing fuel on the fire of the audio discussion…

    https://vimeo.com/107825910

    Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Herb Sevush

    October 29, 2015 at 1:04 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “At the risk of tossing fuel on the fire of the audio discussion…”

    Lovely piece, thanks for posting. Cione is obviously a very talented guy, and except for the line “I’ve never seen an NLE offer as much with the sound side” very informative. If indeed he’s never seen this ability elsewhere then I can only suppose that he hasn’t tried looking. Ppro could accomplish the same thing without having to create compounds – just by using the track mixer. I did have to chuckle a little bit at his use of the term “magnetic timeline” when he opened up the track — as though he was doing something that any timeline in history couldn’t do as easily. Also notice how the various music clips jump lanes at cut points even though it’s the same instrument (look at 1:57) – that must be fun to work with in a large piece. However it does demonstrate the fact that FCPX has all the tools necessary to create wonderful sound – not better tools, just different tools. As always it’s up to the user to find the tool he prefers.

    Herb Sevush
    Zebra Productions
    —————————
    nothin’ attached to nothin’
    “Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf

  • Jason Jenkins

    October 29, 2015 at 4:04 pm

    [Aindreas Gallagher] “The keyframing system being in the shape it is after a half decade is an utter joke.”

    A few good plug-ins cover a multitude of sins.

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

    Check out my Mormon.org profile.

  • Bill Davis

    October 29, 2015 at 4:08 pm

    Voice One: See – Final Cut Pro X is just too different for me to learn and use.

    Voice Two: See – Every OTHER software also does everything that X can do!

  • Steve Connor

    October 29, 2015 at 4:11 pm

    [Bill Davis] “Voice One: See – Final Cut Pro X is just too different for me to learn and use.

    Exactly which voice said this?

  • Herb Sevush

    October 29, 2015 at 4:34 pm

    [Bill Davis] “Voice One: See – Final Cut Pro X is just too different for me to learn and use.

    Voice Two: See – Every OTHER software also does everything that X can do!”

    Apparently Bill, your hearing voices. You might want to have that checked out.

    But if your referring to my post, I will try to make it clear enough for you to understand without the aid of voices. It is my contention that you can do the same things, although not with the same tools, with all modern NLE software, which is why they all earn the sobriquet “Pro” – Avid, Edius, Vegas, Ppro, FCPX, FCP 7, Lightworks – you could cut a feature or any other type of media with any of them. Each would have strengths and weaknesses that differ from the others, and it is in matching those strengths to an editor’s own workflow preferences that choice is found.

    As to why I don’t personally use FCPX, the answer is the same as for Vegas or Lightworks – at the moment I don’t see a compelling reason to switch. There’s nothing you’ve ever described with X that makes me want to invest the time and energy – other than Audtions, which alone is still not enough. It doesn’t sound, from all the descriptions I’ve heard, that it suits my personal editing preferences. Neither does Avid by the way, and at least there I do have compelling professional reasons to learn it. Still I’ve avoided Avid for the past 20 years – a mere 5 years of avoiding FCPX is just a trifle compared to that.

    Herb Sevush
    Zebra Productions
    —————————
    nothin’ attached to nothin’
    “Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf

  • Bill Davis

    October 29, 2015 at 5:10 pm

    You’re probably right Steve.

    I should have written that first line as “They’ve RUINED Final Cut by making it TOO different. I’m pissed.”

    I shouldn’t post first thing after a long night. ; )

    Know someone who teaches video editing in elementary school, high school or college? Tell them to check out http://www.StartEditingNow.com – video editing curriculum complete with licensed practice content.

  • Bill Davis

    October 29, 2015 at 5:12 pm

    Defined by the company we *don’t* keep?

    I can accept that.

    It’s the way millions upon millions operate.

    Nothing wrong with that.

    Know someone who teaches video editing in elementary school, high school or college? Tell them to check out http://www.StartEditingNow.com – video editing curriculum complete with licensed practice content.

  • Steve Connor

    October 29, 2015 at 5:15 pm

    [Bill Davis] “You’re probably right Steve.

    I should have written that first line as “They’ve RUINED Final Cut by making it TOO different. I’m pissed.”

    Bill, they’re just windmills 🙂

Page 6 of 9

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy