Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums AJA Video Systems Capture Problems with ProRez 422 HQ

  • Capture Problems with ProRez 422 HQ

    Posted by Gary Morris mcbeath on May 27, 2007 at 3:47 am

    Well, fellow bovines, I’ve installed FCS2, and tried out ProRez 422 HQ 1080i; stunning picture quality.

    However, I’ve got a problem, and I’m not sure if it is a Kona problem, or a QT/FCP/computer horsepower problem, but I’ll start here.

    First, my system: G5 dual 2.7, 4.5 GB ram, Kona 2, 4.0 driver, OS-X 10.4.9, QT 7.6, scratch disk is an 8 bay hardware raid 3, tests 54-57 MB/s write, read 68-72 with AJA system test. More than the minimum specs listed in system requirements.

    I am capturing HCCAM 1080i 29.97 material through HD-SDI; I’m using the AJA Kona 2 1080i 29.92 ProRez 422 (HQ) easy set-up. Seq, capt, playback etc all match.

    Two things are happening:

    1. I am dropping frames on capture, about every 2 sec or so.

    2. The video plays back in FCP at roughly twice the normal speed: that is, the video portion of a 46 sec clip plays in about 23-24 secs, while the play head continues with the audio in real time to the end of the 46 sec clip.

    Yet, if I exit FCP, and play the clip in QT, the video plays for the full 46 sec, although with occasional jumpiness caused by the dropped frames.

    I’ve tried all the “safe” and dynamic playback settings as well as unlimited RT, to no avail. Video frame rate set at “full”.

    My raid should be fast enough to handle at least one stream of this new codec, so I wouldn’t think it is my scratch disk.

    I’m stumped. Any pearls of wisdom from you Memorial Day weekend grazers out there?

    Thanks,

    Gary

    Jeff Bernstein replied 18 years, 11 months ago 13 Members · 28 Replies
  • 28 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    May 27, 2007 at 5:31 am

    You have an 8 bay raid hardware raid3 and you are getting 60 MB/sec? Sounds like you have bigger issues.

    Jeremy

  • Gary Morris mcbeath

    May 27, 2007 at 6:14 am

    Not sure what you mean. I know it’s not like the newer units; It’s an older Jems unit with ATA drives, had it since 2002, that’s as fast as it’s ever been. Driven by an ATTO UL4D SCSI card, latest drivers. About the same speed as a G-Raid with two SATA drives.

    But that should be fast enough for one, maybe two streams of ProRez HQ right? Around 27-30MB/s max?

    I’ve read every manual, tried everything I can think of for two days.

    Thanks,

    Gary

  • David Roth weiss

    May 27, 2007 at 6:26 am

    q[piper] “scratch disk is an 8 bay hardware raid 3, tests 54-57 MB/s write, read 68-72”

    Gary,

    First, your throughput is awfully low for an 8-drive raid array. You’re getting only slightly higher read/write than what I get on a single drive. My 4-drive SATA array averages 191.0 for both read and write. Something seems wrong with your numbers or with your raid subsystem.

    More importantly, these read/write speeds are too low for capturing HDCAM and are more than likely not capable of maintaining the throughput necessary for conversion to ProRes422 during capture.

    David

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor/Post-production Supervisor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

  • Gary Morris mcbeath

    May 27, 2007 at 6:45 am

    I was afraid of that. When I look at the graph on the AJA system test, there are little short duration spikes that go way down. I’ve been looking at the average write speed.

    As I indicated, this is an older unit, albiet with new drives and new UL4D SCSI card, worked great for SD and works great for AJA DVCProHD; I had hoped it would be good for at least one stream of ProRez. Guess not.

    Just an additional note: my year & a half old G-Raid FW800 320GB raid0 tests at the same speed as the larger unit with AJA’s system test.

    So, what might the reason for the double speed/half duration video play back, while the audio goes the full duration of the clip? Remember, I tested the clips in QT and it plays at normal speed and duration, just with the occasional jumpiness from the dropped frames.

    Boy, you folks are as bad as me, working all night. I guess we love our work.

    Thanks for all your interest.

    Gary

  • Bob Zelin

    May 27, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    Hi Piper –
    as everyone else has already stated, your issue is with your drive array. Right now, if you use AJA Kona System test on your internal boot drive on your MAC, you will get about 60mb/sec. I don’t know the older SCSI to ATA JEMS unit, but older 8 bay SCSI arrays (8 Seagate SCSI drives with an even older ATTO UL3D) were over 200mb/sec, and were the original type of arrays that were recommended for uncompressed HD. So old does not mean that it does not work.

    It always frustrates me when one drive in a JBOD that is dying boggs the system down, instead of simply just not working. This is how you need to find this issue (and I know this will be painful). You need to DELETE the RAID, and test EACH DRIVE ONE AT A TIME with AJA Kona System test. You will find that only one drive is much slower than the rest. For a quick fix, you will find that simply disconnecting this one drive, will allow your RAID to run at correct speeds for what you are doing (220mb/sec with ProRez 422HQ). Once you find the slow drive, just stripe the remaining 7 RAID 0, and away you go. You will be back in business.

    Bob Zelin

  • Gary Morris mcbeath

    May 27, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    Bob,

    That makes sense; I’ll give it a try. Since it is a hardware controlled raid, not striped by software in the computer, the computer sees it as one drive. But I think I can test each drive by removing the others (they are on sleds), or test them two at at time and by a process of elimination find the offender.

    I have a sense, though, that it may be time for a new one. This unit wasn’t very fast from day one; oringinally had 125 GB drives, then I replaced them with 250’s with 8mb cache. Same speed. And these new drives only have a 150 hrs or so on them. It has dual power supplies, dual fans, and dual controllers. I once tried restriping it as RAID 0, only got a 12% increase in speed. The company that made it started out as Infotrend, later became Jems, then was bought out by RAID Inc. They no longer support this unit.

    Thanks Bob, I appreciate the info. I’ll get back on this.

    Gary
    SaltAire Cinema Productions

  • Bob Zelin

    May 27, 2007 at 5:09 pm

    WOW, I know this drive array – Infortrend is STILL IN BUSINESS, and you can send it directly to them for support.

    Your unit will attempt to create a RAID, when you turn it back on, so at 2 drives at a time, this will be a VERY time consuming process.

    bob Zelin

    Infortrend Corporation
    2200 Zanker Road, Unit D,
    San Jose, CA. 95131, USA
    Tel: +1-408-988-5088

  • Gary Morris mcbeath

    May 27, 2007 at 8:17 pm

    Hi Bob,

    Yes, I just went through the raid, pulling one of the drives at a time, trying groups of 2 and 4 drives at a time, as well as all 8 drives, all configured as RAID 0; Ran the AJA system test in each configuration.

    Results: all showed an average of around 82 MB/s write/75-80 read; about a 12% increase from the RAID 3 config. Didn’t matter if it was two disks or 8: same nominal results.

    With the slight increase from the RAID 0, I again captured a couple HDCAM clips: still dropped frames, and plays back the video portion at 2x speed, while the audio plays normally for the clip duration.

    I’ll contact Infotrend on Tuesday, but their website says support for resellers only, no end user support. But I’ll try anyway.

    I heard somewhere that the Kona2 does not do any hardware acceleration for ProRez like it does for DVCProHD. I’m thinking that might be a factor here as well.

    Thanks to all of you for your help.

    Gary
    SaltAire Cinema Productions

  • Bob Zelin

    May 27, 2007 at 10:14 pm

    82mb/sec won’t help you – 2 internal SATA drives in your G5 will do 128mb/sec, which is certainly enough for uncompressed 10 bit SDI and DVCProHD. I can’t answer on this about Pro Res 422 HQ. Many products, including the Cal Digit, and many others, will EASILY handle
    ProRes 422 HQ, as well as DNxHD for AVID , and so much more. If you don’t want to spend any money, I urge you to directly contact Infortrend.

    Bob Zelin

  • Gary Morris mcbeath

    May 27, 2007 at 10:49 pm

    I’ll give them a call Tuesday; But I’ll probably spend the $ for a new raid, however. Then the older unit will be a nice, big, parity protected backup drive.

    Thanks again for all your help.

    Gary

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy