Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 13
  • I’m running 10.11.6 El Capitan and PPro 2017, just short of the very latest update which I’ll install tonight.

  • William Carr

    February 1, 2017 at 1:21 am in reply to: mac book pro early 2013 and 4k video

    I have travelled and edited 4K with a portable bus-powered RAID 0, and sometimes a portable external bus-powered Thunderbolt SSD.
    And if you’re indoors somewhere in your travels where you can plug something in to a power outlet, there are many small-size RAID 0 choices.

    And as I mentioned if you transcode your clips to an intraframe format, that is much less processor-intensive for your Mac to manage.

  • William Carr

    January 31, 2017 at 6:51 pm in reply to: mac book pro early 2013 and 4k video

    I’m editing on MBPRO of similar specs and age w 4K regularly.

    One difference is I transcode all my camera clips to ProRes and that becomes my media.
    Reason being I find the intraframe format gives me smooth playback and fast operation with PPRO. I’m a long time Final Cut user from the pre-X days so the transcode is no issue to me and these days doesn’t take too long.

    All my media is accessed from- and video previews are rendered to- external RAIDs (SSD and not) via Thunderbolt and USB 3. I use both RAID 0 and 5 depending on complexity of project.

    Suggest you update to latest PPRO and try a RAID if you haven’t yet.

  • William Carr

    November 27, 2016 at 9:17 pm in reply to: Remove FXfactory Demos from Effects & Transitions?!

    Thank you much!

  • William Carr

    November 27, 2016 at 9:05 pm in reply to: Remove FXfactory Demos from Effects & Transitions?!

    Thank you Simon…
    I deleted the app in the effort to remove them… my lesson learned is research first, action second!

  • William Carr

    January 1, 2016 at 5:26 pm in reply to: Transcode or not? (hassle notwithstanding)

    Thanks very much Ivan, this info is a great step for me to start using PPro as a key business tool!

  • William Carr

    December 31, 2015 at 7:51 pm in reply to: Transcode or not? (hassle notwithstanding)

    That’s excellent info, thank you!

    If I’m not creating preview files, then it seems like the version I’ve rendered in my sequence is already superior in spec to the ProRes 422 I usually export as a “master”.

    How would I export that sequence “preview” with its awesome spec– what format is that?

  • William Carr

    December 31, 2015 at 5:51 pm in reply to: Transcode or not? (hassle notwithstanding)

    Thank you Ivan, that’s very clear! It made me realize I have one more question if I may–

    After I render a sequence of color-corrected, scaled camera-native H.264 clips, it plays smoothly and looks sharp. But what am I watching exactly, a proxy of some kind? Because if I then export the rendered sequence that can take a while too.

  • William Carr

    May 14, 2015 at 3:08 am in reply to: ProRes 422 LT Easy Setup Option?

    If you’re starting with a new blank sequence then use the method above to create a sequence that matches the format of your source clips. As long as all those ProRes LT files are the same characteristics, you shouldn’t have to render until you do something with them that needs it.

  • William Carr

    October 28, 2014 at 10:54 pm in reply to: Short-throw Projector for all-purpose happiness?

    Thanks for the response, those are good points!

Page 1 of 13

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy