Forum Replies Created

Page 34 of 39
  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 13, 2010 at 8:08 pm in reply to: 2010 Mac Pro benching yet?

    Sounds excellent! I’ll be looking forward to seeing your results.

    I’m definitely waiting to install Resolve on my mac before deciding. Hell, even if I can get ~18fps playback it’ll feel realtime compared to Color.

    Side question: if Resolve is playing at less than real time, can it still do sound playback?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 13, 2010 at 12:00 pm in reply to: 2010 Mac Pro benching yet?

    But the system has to have at least 8 cores, it seems. I’m seeing benchmarks where the 2009 and 2010 quad core systems return slower than 2008 results. Does that sound about right?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 3, 2010 at 5:21 am in reply to: Message to Grant Petty

    Cool. You’re talking half-rez debayer, correct?

    I suppose either way I’ll give it a whirl on my 2008 and see what happens, and as money permits upgrade.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 3, 2010 at 12:36 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve for Mac Configuration Guide

    Best I could suggest to you is Lenovo L220x display, if you can find one. The only 22″ 1920×1200 display (as far as I know). I’ve had one for a while, and it’s a pretty darn good screen, although emits a bit too much heat for my tastes.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 3, 2010 at 12:31 am in reply to: Message to Grant Petty

    I’m curious if anyone’s benchmarked a 2008 system for performance. I believe every time I’ve seen it discussed words like “performance would be lower” are used, implying a theoretical estimation. But I haven’t quite heard anyone come out and say “yes, we’ve ran it, and this is how it’s limiting”

    I’m just a little confused because from what I understand the 2009 model differs from 2008 by including 4 PCIe x16 slots, newer type RAM, and a faster processor architecture (not necessarily clock speed). But since the 2 GPUs will run on 2008’s 16x lanes, and DaVinci does all graphics computation on the GPU, I am not sure what’s going to be slowing the system down.

    I’d love to know what it is that proves to be problematic on the 2008 models and how it actually affects performance.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 1, 2010 at 1:17 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve for Mac Configuration Guide

    Just saw this and figured those with HDMI blues might be interested:

    https://www.sharbor.com/products/BMDN5430014.html#

    If you do the whole “email me a better price” it comes out to be only $440, free shipping, and depending on where you are, no tax. Not bad!

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 1, 2010 at 12:58 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve for Mac Configuration Guide

    Disguise the cable to look like a worm coming out of the apple and you’ve got one sweet casemod!

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    August 31, 2010 at 11:14 pm in reply to: DaVinci Resolve for Mac Configuration Guide

    Yyeah, I mean there’s always the side of your mac pro but that’s almost TOO cruel!

    If HDMI is a deal braker, one could always get an HDLink – at $470 it’s definitely affordable and gives you some more image calibration control which is always nice.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    August 31, 2010 at 10:10 pm in reply to: DaVinci Resolve for Mac Configuration Guide

    Exactly what I did actually. I used empty space on the plate of my raid controller to create a hole large enough for 1 HDMI cable. Works, even if it’s not exactly pretty!

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    August 31, 2010 at 3:01 pm in reply to: DaVinci Resolve for Mac Configuration Guide

    Seems pretty comprehensive. I guess 2008 model macs are officially not certified? Hopefully they’ll work anyway!

    Also, does this mean we’re close to release?

Page 34 of 39

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy