Tom Sefton
Forum Replies Created
-
Tom Sefton
October 29, 2013 at 6:43 pm in reply to: FCP-X plus new MacPro = 16 track Multicam of 4k footage? Really??.[Andy Branner] “:-)))) … right. So you’re doing nearly 600MB/s on your internal bus. Mmmmh-hmmmm… gotcha. LOL
Yeah, that totally beats the Mac Pro’s internal 1+GB/s… you totally got me.
Oh, and next time maybe at least TRY to hide the fact that the clips are (at best) running at quarter-res… mind you, 4K ProRes is 66+MB/s…
:facepalm:
Keep trying. :-D”
Try and give a modicum of respect towards a fellow professional who is showing the honest performance of a machine. This has been an interesting conversation so try and keep it interesting for the right reasons.
-
Tom Sefton
October 23, 2013 at 10:10 pm in reply to: So where are the 4K monitors to go with the multiple 4K outputs on a MacPro?Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Tom Sefton
October 14, 2013 at 9:41 am in reply to: OK, so it’s not about video per say, but it’s pretty funny…Top one is painful.
Brilliant.
-
Tom Sefton
September 27, 2013 at 10:32 am in reply to: How the H**L do we keep track of where the clients moved to and who the new person is?Swallows? It’s the salmon of capistrano…..
-
Depends on so many different things. If you are on Mac then go for a ProRes422 sequence. If PC, then a Blackmagic or Cineform one is good. Otherwise, a PNG or TIFF sequence is good for graphics sequences.
-
Could you export a TGA sequence and a separate wav or mp3 file and let them handle it?
-
put them all end to end in premiere in a sequence called “compilation” or something. Open a new sequence and nest your compilation sequence inside it by dragging it onto the timeline. Right click over the sequence on the timeline and change the speed.
This will then need rendering, but should work ok.
-
OK, so if you are creating a graphics sequence in 25p then render it out at 25 frames progressive.
When you bring it into Premiere, interpret your footage to 50i and see if this helps.
-
You can’t really convert 25p to 50p in an effective way. 50p is 50 progressive (full frames) per second – twice the amount in 25p footage. You are asking for an extra 25 frames per second to be created, so your editing program will duplicate frames, hence the blurring.
The only other option available if you need 50p footage from a camera that wont shoot 1920×1080 50p, is to shoot 1280×720 at 50p and then resize your footage.
-
Tom Sefton
September 16, 2013 at 9:14 pm in reply to: When do you think Apple will pull the rug out from under you again?I can’t think of a single equipment or software upgrade in the last 10 years that we have made that hasn’t helped our productions get better in quality, faster, easier to plan and execute and higher in standard of video. Apple has been as big a part of this as any supplier with the exception of blackmagic design.