Forum Replies Created

Page 66 of 85
  • Tom Brooks

    August 5, 2007 at 11:41 am in reply to: opps! more fun with aspect ratios…

    Scale one clip as you want it. Select that clip. Select from menu, Edit – Copy (command-C). Select multiple other clips. From menu, Edit – Paste Attributes (option-V). Check the box for Basic Motion and click OK. Maybe you have used this before. If not, check the manual under Copying and Pasting Specific Clip Attributes.

  • Tom Brooks

    August 4, 2007 at 1:28 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    It’s a 2:1 pulldown! But pleeez keep it way away from my interlaced TV.
    :o)

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 9:31 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    Last results. The 30P DVD that JeremyG suggested I try worked just fine. But I can’t really tell you if the player is outputting progressive or not because this DVD would look the same either way. Played on the progressive DVD player and the plasma, it looks fine. Nothing wrong with it. (Remember that playback on interlaced display was artifacted.)

    I also made a 24P DVD. That one is definitely progressive. It plays very nicely with the plasma. With this, I was able to make a comparison between the 24P sequence played through the Kona with 2:3:2:3 pulldown reinserted and the DVD outputting 24P. The DVD looks better…because it is purely progressive.

    Conclusions?
    60i – Best for NTSC displays and players. Artifacts on progressive displays. (Although the Panasonic plasma does a very good job with it overall.)

    30P – Best reserved for progressive display only, whether it’s DVD, computer, or whatever. Artifacts in NTSC interlaced. Artifacts minimized by slower action and movement.

    24P – Great for progressive DVD on progressive display. Not so great on DVD without progressive output where the fields and pulldown are an issue.

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 6:41 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    Tried the 30P DVD. I duped the regular DV NTSC sequence with the alternating clips in it and then opened the settings and changed the Field Dom to None. This didn’t appear to change anything in the sequence at all. Exported via Compressor. I used a modified preset in which I simply changed the video format field dom to None. All the rest on automatic. Built and burnt the DVD.

    Played it in a Pioneer DVR-510H. That’s the best player I have in house. Component output set to Progressive. Analog cables connected to Panasonic TH37PH9UK plasma. I have two choices for a thing called Pure Cinema “to set playback of film source.” The no fields stuff looks the same with Pure Cinema on or off–no difference. The stuff with fields looks smooth edged with it off and comb edged with Pure Cinema ON. I guess this is what some call Film Mode? Anyhow, here’s what it looks like:

    No fields ball:
    Looks decent in motion, but again the motion is real fast, so it has a flicker to it. That’s to be expected. Big jumps from frame to frame. But it does look fine on the edges as best I can tell. Paused, great as always.

    Fields ball:
    Mixed results for fields ball on the progressive DVD. With Pure Cinema turned ON, the edges are combed, fluttery, and have a double ghost around the ball. The worst. With the PUre Cinema OFF, the fields ball actually looks very good. It’s smooth on the edge and in its motion. When you pause, it flutters back and forth. Surprisingly, with Pure Cinema OFF, there is no comb edge either when it’s moving or in pause. With this setting, the fields ball looks better than the no fields ball while it’s moving. The motion flicker is just too much for the no fields method at this speed.

    Here’s my encode summary for the 30P DVD. See anything wrong in there?

    Name: MPEG-2 6.2Mbps 2-pass 4:3-29.97P
    Description: Fits up to 90 minutes of video with Dolby Digital audio at 192 Kbps or 60 minutes with AIFF audio on a DVD-5
    File Extension: m2v
    Type: MPEG-2 video elementary stream
    Video Encoder
    Format: M2V
    Width: 720
    Height: 480
    Pixel aspect ratio: NTSC CCIR 601/DV
    Crop: None
    Frame rate: 29.97
    Frame Controls: Automatic
    Aspect ratio: 4:3
    Field dominance: Progressive scan
    Average data rate: 6.2 (Mbps)
    2 Pass VBR enabled
    Maximum data rate: 7.7 (Mbps)
    High quality
    Best motion estimation
    Closed GOP Size: 15, Structure: IBBP
    DVD Studio Pro meta-data enabled

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 6:01 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    I know all that. All right, to play along with this.

    Played in Quicktime on the Dell 2405:
    The no fields ball looks pretty good. It’s moving too fast for the LCD to keep it super clean, but it looks like it’s supposed to. When you pause it, it’s fine.

    The fields ball has comb edges when it’s moving. It also has comb edges when it’s in pause. No surprises there.

    Played straight out of FCP, Kona LHe to plasma, analog component, 525i29.97:
    This surprises me some.
    The no fields ball in motion has a very jumpy flicker to it. I would expect that because it’s moving real fast and there’s a big jump in postion from one frame to the next. When you pause it, it’s perfect.

    The fields ball is what surprised me a bit. When it’s moving, it’s smooth. It’s not jumpy like the no fields ball. It does not have a comb edge or a ghosted edge. When you pause it, the image on the plasma flutters for a split sec and then freezes with an obvious comb edge. I expected to see comb while it was moving as well. Obviously, the Dell monitor is getting progressive signal via DVI while the plasma is getting 525i from the Kona.

    I’m also trying to make the progressive DVD you suggested earlier.

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 5:33 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    Still there Dave? I have only the two versions so far. I didn’t try the 24P yet. I’ll try to describe what I’m seeing on playback from the DVD.

    I used a white ball on a black background with no motion blur. The ball is about a third of the screen’s width. I used linear keyframes adjusted by eyeball to make the speed of the ball look approximately constant. It loops seamlessly. The 2 second clips alternate–no fields version / fields version, etc.

    Animation with fields:
    The ball with fields looks like a ball. Its edges are smooth and round in general. There is a just noticeable stairstep on the edge of the ball. The movement of the ball is smooth. When I PAUSE during the fields ball, it appears to vibrate or flutter back and forth. The double edge of the fluttering ball is ghosted out to about half brightness and has very obvious scan lines in it.

    Animation with no fields:
    When the no fields ball is in PLAY it has fluttery, vibrating edges that look exactly like the flutter on the paused ball with fields. The edge is ghosted and has obvious scan lines in it. When the no fields ball section is in PAUSE, it looks perfect.

    So, tell me why I’m supposed to like the look of this fluttery 30P version that only looks good when it’s in PAUSE.

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 5:01 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    Switching to DVDSP. Back in a few.

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 4:38 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    Dave,
    This is what I’m looking for. I’ll give it a go in After Effects. So, you want me to alternate the two versions in the timeline say a second each, so as to compare the look of the two versions in a repeating A/B comparison? I’m going to leave out the motion blur for this.

    I’ll use a standard DV NTSC sequence in FC, fields set to lower first.

    The DVD will be completely standard, too. In DVDSP I’ll choose a high quality setting and leave all the controls on automatic, just like it came out of the box.

    Play it on a DVD player, composite output to an NTSC monitor. ‘Zat right?
    -Tom

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 3:32 pm in reply to: 30p in final cut pro: is it worth it?

    Jeremy,
    No offense taken. Yeah, I agree I’m thinking this to death. I’m interested in the “see it with your own eyes” test proposed by Dave. I’ll try it and report my results. Would you mind doing the same?
    Thanks.
    Tom

  • Tom Brooks

    August 3, 2007 at 2:14 pm in reply to: Best codec to do animations in

    Rafael,
    Do I understand correctly that you set up your sequence in FCP with Sheer as the codec in the Quicktime Video Setting? Or is your sequence 10b uncompressed and you render the Sheer encoded clips on the timeline?
    Thanks.
    -Tom

Page 66 of 85

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy