Toke
Forum Replies Created
-
They had hard work for designing the look so that the difference does not show.
One key aspect was to lower the shadows so that the noise wouldn’t be so noticable.
Only bad thing is that to match two different pictures you have to lower the quality to the level of the worse camera.One problem to fix cameras with different gate/sensor sizes is DoF.
In Collateral when they used overspeed filmcameras with f2.8 with normal speed digital cameras with f1.3 side by side. This was done to achieve similiar DoF and film had to be pushed 3 stops. (Well, the other option would have been to get lots of light and lots of NDs in front of digiprimes.Same way it will be hard to match hvx’s DoF with bigger cameras.
-
[David Battistella] “
-
I hope Panny (or someone else) will release finally 16:9 sq.pix recording format for lower price cameras.
Hvx200 could already had 1280x720p24/25/50/60@4:2:0@100Mbps, which I believe would have been optimal combination for PQ with its ccd’s and recording datarate.
Well, maybe hvx300 then… -
Dvcprohd has been edited for years and datarate has been very known 100Mbit/s = 12.5MBps.
What hdd speed you need depends on how many video streams you want to playback realtime when editing.
You can check hdd speeds eg. from storagereview.com. -
TeraStation with raid5 would be perfect file server, but current model has underpowered cpu, so write speed in raid5 is less than 50Mbit/s. I’m waiting for the next fixed model and then buy it.
It would be also nice to be able to buy hdd’s for terastation separately.
I have this funny superstition that I trust only seagates nowadays.
Well, with raid5 wd’s might be also fine if they have 5 years warranty. -
With natural footage and progressive frames, I’d say that difference between 4:2:0 and 4:2:2 is very small.
With chroma keying and graphics (without anti-aliasing = ugly) etc. there is a difference.
With interlaced picture (which should have been history by now) 4:2:2 was much needed, because each field needed its separate picture. -
Sorry about that, if I’m picking too much.
I’ve beed sick and in bed for 2 days so I’ve had too much time for surfing around…
I just thought those numbers might clarify the situation to somebody. -
It’s not half the compression.
Dv (4:2:0 or 4:1:1) has 12b/px, so datarate is 124Mbps and with 25Mbps it has compression rate of 5:1.
Dvcpro (4:2:2) has 16b/px, so datarate is 166Mbps and with 50Mbps it has compression rate of 3.3:1.
So dvcpro has 33% lighter compression than dv. -
Yep, I noticed that after a little scrubbing with qt player.
I tried to use fcp’s cinema tools to remove pulldown, but I couldn’t find the right settings.
(CT is a new tool for me…)
What would the right settings be?
(I tried few combinations, but always some frames were construced out of two frames…)
Shouldn’t cinema tools find the right settings automatically like it should from dvx’s footage? -
1080iP2.mov really seems to 1080i (like the name of the file) and deinterlaced from that.
Eg. movement in hand with paper etc…
Was that really shot 1080p?