Forum Replies Created

Page 37 of 84
  • I have an annual subscription but it is billed in monthly increments. So it is necessary for them to keep you card info on file.

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    August 22, 2013 at 10:14 pm in reply to: So have you switched to Premiere Pro?

    Pretty good for straight editing. Still a cluster f**k for multicam. I wish I could just choose what to work with but in my case it’s just not that simple. There is a serious base out there (especially in docs) that is entrenched in FCP 7 and they will be until it finally dies the true death. Same situation with Avid. More and more I use what the project comes to me in. If one comes to me in FCPX then I’ll use that.

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    August 13, 2013 at 10:50 pm in reply to: So what is happening with NLE’s in your area

    No, my math is wrong. If I had to pay a second year at rack rate then I’d pay almost exactly the same as the person who took the guaranteed $479/yr for two years. Actually I’d save two bucks.

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    August 13, 2013 at 10:38 pm in reply to: So what is happening with NLE’s in your area

    Which would end up being quite a bit cheaper than the $29.99 a month for a year “deal” that I got.

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    June 26, 2013 at 4:04 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro Multicam

    Oh, boy. Thanks for the info, Chris.

    Tim

  • Probably someone like so many of us on this forum who are too old, too set in their ways, and too frightened to see the future.

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    June 9, 2013 at 11:12 pm in reply to: The latest MacPro rumor with screenshot

    I kind of don’t care what it looks like if it meets my needs for – say, five years – even four years – I’ll buy it. But based on what I’ve been seeing out of this company for since about 2008 I would not be surprised if it did not even meet my needs from two years ago.

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    June 9, 2013 at 7:59 pm in reply to: apple patents keyframing.

    Patent law these days is surreal. People found business with the sole idea of suing for patent infringement. I was just reading about some goofballs who are suing anyone providing public WI-FI saying they have a patent on it. From what I understand in their corporate literature they say they they have no intention of going after folks using WI-FI in their own homes “at this stage.”

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    June 7, 2013 at 6:06 pm in reply to: Since everyone here is old and grumpy…

    I’m really not that grumpy…

    Tim

  • Timothy Auld

    June 5, 2013 at 9:11 pm in reply to: FCP X Professional Opinions

    Really Charlie? Look back a few years.

    Tim

Page 37 of 84

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy