Timothy Auld
Forum Replies Created
-
Explcitly: You gotta buy the tube.
Tim
-
I’m not sure that I follow your logic that if it doesn’t work for me now it won’t work for me in the future. I can point to many times where something didn’t work for for me at the moment but the very same thing worked for me a few years down the road. And certainly you are right that Apple will be around five years from now. My question is not only will they make a product that meets my needs five years hence but are they committed to doing so. And Apple has been – for the last three years – quite mute on that subject.
Tim
-
It is an investment. It’s an investment in where the technology is going. How do you not see that?
Tim
-
Not to mention that I did not “utter” it to you but to Mr. Duy Vu. Perhaps you should best let him respond.
Tim
-
Is there a subject and a predicate there?
Tim
-
I said it pretty exactly. Can I trust this company to make software that meets my needs. Your implication that I can’t afford the $299 notwithstanding.
Tim
-
I never said you were not part of the “real’ world, Steve. Just that what FCPX has to offer at the moment does not – even remotely – meet my needs. Cheers.
Tim
-
I have forgotten more about organization than you will ever know,
Tim
-
I don’t need or want to think about these things. I need them to work. And they don’t in X. I do understand that in a year I may be working with this thing (as I used to call Avid) but right now I don’t care. FCPX does not work for me or anything that I have to deliver. It may work in a 4K workflow (not even remotely a delivery situation) thing that I have coming up soon. But who is starting and ending post production in FCPX in a complex workflow right now? Or in six months? Or in a year? Or in five years? Can anyone out there tell me seriously that FCPX is a part of a five year business plan?
Tim
-
Quite happy that you don’t have to operate under the constraints that I do, Steve.
Tim