Forum Replies Created

Page 20 of 30
  • Stig Olsen

    April 19, 2012 at 1:27 pm in reply to: 709 scale RGB for web

    It is just a single clip (dnxHD185) so it should be fine.
    I did test the same clip in adobe media encoder and that works perfect. It has always been some issues with the mpeg4 encoding in Squeeze so I guess this is just another of them. Thanks anyway, mixdown probably works fine.

  • Stig Olsen

    April 19, 2012 at 1:12 pm in reply to: 709 scale RGB for web

    I have tried that too, but for some reason the video from Sorenson gives me some white blanking throughout the whole video. I guess its a codec thing, but everything is transcoded to dnx and exported same as source.

    sorenson 7, mpeg 4

  • Stig Olsen

    April 14, 2012 at 3:40 pm in reply to: Where to apply Lut

    Hi Teo,

    You mean for cinema delivery, but what about television / web?
    What do you mean with the need of applying LUTs in two operations?
    Shouldnt you just apply an (alexa) output lut on, lets say the second node, that gives you the opportunity to grade before and after the Lut?

  • Stig Olsen

    April 13, 2012 at 1:02 pm in reply to: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league?

    Hi David,

    Its been some years since I worked on a symphony system myself but after what Ive been told. They have not updated their color grading tools in symphony in years. You can do some regular secondary adjustments and some basic balancing. The workflow is great, since its included in the software but the limitations in advanced techniques are many.

    The reduction of the time limited campaign they are offering now are probably a sign that Avid will start developing some new tools for symphony. But as you know, it takes time with Avid. BMD will most likely improve their product in a rocket pace the next months and years, and my guess is that symphony always never really will be able to keep up.

    For TV episode work I think this is a great solution because you basically need some balancing tools. No doubt it will be faster. But for commercials and good looking corporate films… Go for Resolve.

  • Stig Olsen

    April 11, 2012 at 10:31 am in reply to: After Effects to Resolve

    Ok thank!

  • Stig Olsen

    April 11, 2012 at 10:17 am in reply to: After Effects to Resolve

    Ok, so for performance and not improvement of quality.

  • Stig Olsen

    April 10, 2012 at 10:43 pm in reply to: Resolve NAB Speculation

    BMD should not use all their valuable time improving XML and advanced support functions for FCP anymore in my opinion.
    “Everyone” knows that they are about to die completely, (even though the lovers will not accept the way of thinking) and if BMD could focus completely on other editing solutions as Avid, the development will go much faster. Your clients? They will sooner or later need to put their money in other systems as well.

  • Stig Olsen

    April 10, 2012 at 6:23 pm in reply to: After Effects to Resolve

    Thanks for your inputs.
    Why do you convert it to DPX? You dont improve quality if you convert it, do you? I thought the best way is to stay native as long as possible?

    I know it is crap, but we have actually made some TV-commercial shot on 5D lately that I think we made look good:

    https://sheriffcompany.no/?section=reklamefilm&videoId=51&lang=

    and

    https://sheriffcompany.no/?section=reklamefilm&videoId=52&lang=

  • Stig Olsen

    April 10, 2012 at 3:08 pm in reply to: After Effects to Resolve

    Ok, and the cineform LUT will work the same way on the DPX as the original file?
    The reason why Im asking is if I can grade the original footage and then replace without experiencing any changes.

    Stig

  • Stig Olsen

    April 9, 2012 at 7:57 pm in reply to: Promax One Hero

    Ok, thank you. The need of Cubux is the reason I want to ditch Mac Pro. Guess this means I will go for a PC.

Page 20 of 30

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy