[Simon Ubsdell] “And I think the FCPX model with its insidiously seductive data management tools makes the danger of losing track of your material all the more acute. There’s clearly even more of a sense in which the organization takes the place of the actual editing. There is a real potential for false confidence, confidence that you’ve rejected, and selected, the right stuff and you can start the edit from that point – without going continually going back.
For me, and it’s just a personal judgement, editing is essentially one process from start to finish and it’s a process that involves continuous evaulation – and more importantly re-evaluation – of the material.
That’s why I’m not sure that FCPX is necessarily a force for good in all this!
“
Perhaps, but the skimmer gives you such a great way to view ALL your footage very quickly that for me it makes it much LESS likely I miss something, even when I’ve organised footage before the edit.
I also think the new timeline is fantastic for experimenting with edits and crashing things together to see what works and what doesn’t, before you start the edit.
I’m just about to finish the first cut of a feature I’ve been working on. I planned to organise all the media before I started, but once I began playing with shots on the timeline, things just moved quickly and I’ve ended up hardly logging any of it!
Steve Connor
“FCPX Agitator”
Adrenalin Television