Forum Replies Created

Page 4 of 10
  • S. Marcotte

    October 3, 2007 at 4:58 pm in reply to: Auto-trace layer problem

    I did set for apply to new layer. I’ve done this before without a hitch. Feels like a glitch. I get some pretty funky results when don’t apply to new layer as well. Might be time for a reinstall.

    I’ve done that tutorial. It’s a good one.

  • S. Marcotte

    September 19, 2007 at 10:19 pm in reply to: frames instead of timecode

    Perfect. Thanks.

  • S. Marcotte

    September 13, 2007 at 7:47 pm in reply to: Fields

    You have no idea how happy that makes me.

    Fact is, I can tell when the image is moving along the way it should at 24fps. That part is easy enough. I don’t even mind selecting the right cadence myself, one shot at a time.

    My big concern is this: I’m worried that somewhere, somehow, AE will see fit to interpolate a field without telling me. I simply would not be able to tell on this monitor.

    So, to wrap things up, here’s what I’m doing:

    1) I load my 29.97 footage;
    2) I interpret it lower first, guess pulldown;
    3) I drop it into a new comp, which automatically goes to 23.976;
    4) I frame-by-frame a segment with a lot of motion, I see that that every frame progresses forward, no combing;
    5) I smile and I walk away.

  • S. Marcotte

    September 13, 2007 at 7:18 pm in reply to: Fields

    …but if I choose the wrong cadence on a given shot, it WILL be noticeable in my 23.976 composition with pulldown removed, right?

    I did a small test. 4 out of the 5 possible cadences led to some unsightly interlacing. Is this simply a lucky shot, or will the same happen on every shot?

    Please say yes.

  • S. Marcotte

    September 13, 2007 at 6:59 pm in reply to: Fields

    I was completely aware that the cadence often resets between shots. I sincerely was. I’m going at it one shot at a time.

    Yes, entire tapes were captured. These tapes were then split with an AVI splitter because my AE wouldn’t load them otherwise. It’s quite a handful, as you can imagine, but it’s fairly under control.

    It’s DVCPRO50, shot with the SDX-900.

  • S. Marcotte

    September 13, 2007 at 5:10 pm in reply to: Fields

    The editor is me. I also did the catering. You get the picture.

    I get the distinct feeling I’m going to have to find the first clear and obvious cadence and start counting backwards until I reach the start of the colour bars.

    Am I right?

  • S. Marcotte

    September 13, 2007 at 4:50 pm in reply to: Fields

    Yes. I understand this quite well. I simply didn’t know that “3:2 pulldown” applied to this process. Makes complete sense, though. Except for the “pullDOWN” part. Shouldn’t it be called a “pull-UP”? I mean, you’re pulling the footage UP to 30, aren’t you?

    I digress.

    Here’s another issue: AE can’t guess the pulldown cadence when the footage opens with colour bars.

    Any way to make this happen, without the insanity of counting, past 30 seconds of bars, past frozen actors, until I finally reach movement and that combing effect?

  • S. Marcotte

    September 13, 2007 at 12:14 am in reply to: Fields

    That’s it. That’s all it took. I always wondered what 3:2 pulldown meant. Thanks a lot for that.

  • S. Marcotte

    August 6, 2007 at 6:24 pm in reply to: Learning vectors

    That was far, far too easy.

    Now waiting for the other shoe to drop. Thanks very much.

  • S. Marcotte

    July 11, 2007 at 9:38 pm in reply to: Are these pixels normal?

    Yes. Of course! I hope your anamorphic analogy is a good one because I think I’ll stick with it. And thanks for the clarity: TV pixel = not square.

Page 4 of 10

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy