[Walter Soyka] “Unfortunately, I think the missing Send to Motion from FCPX feature is a glaring omission that really limits the usefulness of effects work with FCPX, and I hope Apple remedies this soon. (I’d also hope that this would be only one of many interchange features for a future release.)”
I’d also hope that having built Motion 5 so heavily into the FCPX landscape Apple will now start to develop it more seriously than they have in the past and turn it from a very fast and very handy semi-pro tool into one that genuinely competes at the top level.
For example, I’d like to see the introduction of Expressions, as well as extensive channel and colour space manipulation and a bunch of other stuff.
My negative side however keeps telling me that Motion is and will remain a close relative of FCPX in its design philosophy – good enough up to a certain point where it will keep hundreds of thousands of users more than happy but not allowed to develop to the point where it will finally become the grown-up tool that it is perfectly capable of being.
But then again, who knows? I’d love my negative side to be wrong.
Simon Ubsdell
Director/Editor/Writer
http://www.tokyo-uk.com