Forum Replies Created

Page 165 of 285
  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 30, 2013 at 8:06 pm in reply to: repackaging and selling motion content

    [Bret Williams] “Have you watched it? The effects are the same. They admit that. Even keeped the same names.”

    https://www.fcp.co/forum/templates/14824-24-free-final-cut-pro-x-title-templates?limitstart=0

    They used to offer them for free …

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 30, 2013 at 7:29 pm in reply to: repackaging and selling motion content

    From the website:

    Tracey from CineFlare and I (Dylan) combined our supernatural powers to build Title Pop. We wanted a title pack that looked good for the quick drag and drop edit and customizable enough for unique text animations. After adding the final ingredients we stirred the cauldron and out came Title Pop.

    They did stir the cauldron which I reckon probably makes it worth the 50 bucks.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 30, 2013 at 2:43 pm in reply to: repackaging and selling motion content

    [Bob Woodhead] “If you put the prefix “Pro” on your products, it’ll be a game-changer.”

    Maybe think of calling your company something like Pixel Film Studios 😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 30, 2013 at 8:04 am in reply to: repackaging and selling motion content

    [Bret Williams] “How does that sound?”

    Sounds great.

    Do you take PayPal?

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 23, 2013 at 5:35 pm in reply to: Confused with Picture in Picture

    You may be interested in this free plug-in (available through FxFactory) which is designed to help with exactly the task you describe without the need for keyframes:

    https://tokyo-uk.com/fcpxeffects/pipfree.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcoJ5PsiMng&hd=1

    You can of course do it yourself with keyframes but this makes it a lot easier and more flexible, especially if you are doing this kind of thing often.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 19, 2013 at 6:35 pm in reply to: Title/Action Safe grid color change?

    You might find this free title effect handy for this:

    https://www.tokyo-uk.com/fcpxeffects/freedownloads/TKY%20Safe%20Title%20and%20Grid.zip

    A Title Effect that give you the option of both a BBC standard Safe Title/Action Overlay and a layout Grid.

    The effect (which can be placed like a title layer) above your program has a selector for either the Safe Action/Title (with optional crosshairs) or one of two Grid overlays, either squares or 16:9 aspect ratio rectangles (both of which can be scaled to taste), for accurate positioning of titles and other graphics elements.

    There are various controls for the colour of the various elements of the overlays and different components can be switched on/off as desired.

    Note that there are a variety of Safe Action/Title effects out there of varying degrees of accuracy. This one adheres strictly to the BBC standard (Safe Action = 80% active width, 93% active height; Safe Title = 65% active width, 90% active height), but the specifics may vary in your territory.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    May 16, 2013 at 6:17 pm in reply to: Keyframes vs. Behaviors in Motion 4

    [Kelly Lambert] “I’m used to using keyframes (in both FCP and AE) to manipulate my objects but this seems more difficult than it should be in motion.”

    Are there any areas in particular that are giving you problems?

    I’d say that generally Motion’s keyframing toolset is pretty extensive and very easy to use once you are familiar with it.

    And if you don’t want to touch Behaviors, you don’t have to, but there’s a wealth of extra speed and power that they bring that’s fairly astounding. You can very quickly do stuff that would take far longer to achieve, and be much slower to fine tune, in AE.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • A pleasure to help 🙂

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • [Don Eitner] “I was thinking about this tip from Mark Spencer about using a gradient mask.”

    I don’t think that what Tad was asking for though – as I understand it he wants to feather the edges “all round” hence my suggestion to simply use the rectangle mask tool and feather it.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • [tad newberry] ” i’m curious, too, why they default it the other way”

    I guess they had to set the default somewhere – if you make a square or rectangle that is 100 pixels high then the default value works perfectly. If you bear that in mind it’s easy to work out the right numbers for your chosen shape.

    Don’t forget that if you want something different as a “default” that you can easily call up, you can set the Gradient to how you’d like it and then save it as a preset using the Save Gradient option in the Inspector.

    [tad newberry] “Now, i’m looking for a quick easy way to have the edges of a photo or images fade off to transparent all around the edges in Motion. Any ideas on that one? Of course, i’ve played around with making a mask, softening the edges, etc., but it seems like there oughta be a quicker way???”

    It’s pretty quick to select your layer, select the rectangle mask tool, drag it out to the shape of your image, then feather the mask. I can’t think of a quicker way I’m afraid.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

Page 165 of 285

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy