[Jeremy Garchow] “[Shawn Miller] “But these cameras seem to be more popular with indie filmmakers”
So is FCPX popular with indie film makers, and does that make up a bulk of Apple’s users, do you think?”
Yes, I see a lot of FCPX users on the BMD forums. I get the sense that most of them are debayering their raw footage in Resolve though. Lightroom seems to be a popular option for doing this as well.
[Jeremy Garchow] “MXF is an open source standard, too. It took FOREVA for Apple to support MXF. I think that if BM really wanted to, they could write an importer and make it happen. Instead, they are writing their own edit and color correction tool with full support.”
Yeah… truthfully, I thought that was strange too…. that and image sequences, seem like odd things to leave out support for.
I don’t disagree that Blackmagic could probably write a cDNG importer for FCPX… but so could Digital Bolex or Kinefinity. But why would they do that? Apple has way more engineering resources than any of them.
[Jeremy Garchow] “And by the way, just for the record, most people I talk to around town, and the people that they talk to, are going with Pr CC. Everyone looks at me like I’m that guy that actually likes FCPX. It’s allright, i can take it. :)”
lol – I sympathize completely. I was using Vegas years before a lot of editors even knew what it was… it didn’t do a lot for my street cred. 🙂
Shawn