Forum Replies Created

Page 137 of 195
  • [Susan Hunter] “Motion doesn’t seem to have a lot of advantages.”

    If exponentially faster isn’t an advantage, and NLE integration (and a list of other things), then…

    [Susan Hunter] “It’s a pity you need to go to so many different softwares to get what you want to: After Effects,”

    No, there’s Motion. But even PPro users “need” to go to AE for some stuff. I don’t see the difference.

    [Susan Hunter] “PluralEyes”

    No, not in any way a necessity. X has its own synching built in.

    [Susan Hunter] “Davinci, Protools or Logic Pro X”

    No NLE on the market has all the abilities those do combined and never will. There’s also nothing unusual about going to dedicated grading apps and DAWs etc. for finishing. FCP X is in no way an exception.

    [Susan Hunter] “When will there be an all in one? We need this!”

    No one company or software will ever be able to do ALL those things as well as each do individually. I at least do not need a bloated, buggy, convoluted all-in-one myself.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    October 24, 2014 at 4:36 pm in reply to: Can You Organize Projects? (10.1.3)

    You can use keywords and intelligent keywords, just as you can with clips. And then put those in folders if you want. 😀

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    October 24, 2014 at 3:53 pm in reply to: FCP/ Avid/ Premier for doc post producion houses?

    [Jason Porthouse] “with a few more hoops to jump through if you’re going down the ProTools route for audio, or grading in a separate suite.”

    Not the least bit more or less than with Avid in either case. One at best.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    October 24, 2014 at 3:50 pm in reply to: Audio Split Tracks in FCPX

    [Jeremy Garchow] “We will continue to disagree about this”

    This had nothing to do with “disagreeing”, Jeremy. As I’ve already explained extensively, I just plain have no idea how you are doing it from FCP, since what you describe clearly does not result in what you are talking about, for anyone trying it. Aside from you apparently. That’s all.

    Or you’re simply explaining it poorly. I don’t know.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    October 24, 2014 at 10:06 am in reply to: FCP/ Avid/ Premier for doc post producion houses?

    [Charlie Austin] “Seems fairly straightforward:”

    Very odd that there is not a single mention of any type of XML anywhere on the Vegas page. Seeing Oliver’s “success” using it my explain why.

    https://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/vegaspro/techspec

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Robin S. kurz

    October 24, 2014 at 9:55 am in reply to: Audio Split Tracks in FCPX

    [Tim Moyle] “neither of which seem to accomplish what I’m looking for.”

    Yes, as was pointed out before. No one seems to be able to get this to work as described. Certainly not without panning first and if you in fact simply pan each audio file to the left and right, you don’t even need to use roles upon export.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • [Bret Williams] “But in the case of having a lengthy edit of 9 shots or so, and needing to send them to motion/AE and get them back and then be able to edit them again, we don’t have anything close. Send to motion would be the first step. Edit/Open motion would be the next. “

    Absolutely. I also think that the only one of the five options you have for creating a project in Motion, namely just plain PROJECT, will only be further ignored by FCP X (as in completely incompatible) for only so much longer. I’m pretty sure that all of what you describe will become possible via the “normal” project at some point or another and probably even more. I’m just guessing it’s no small feat. Especially since the two teams aren’t even in the same city and just barely in the same state. 🙂

    I’m just pointing out that saying integration/exchange somehow “went away” as a whole with 7, as I took it to mean, is a gross overstatement. It just simply has changed (a lot). Partly for the worse, but overall for the better IMHO (with a lot of room to grow).

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • Robin S. kurz

    October 23, 2014 at 5:29 pm in reply to: FCP/ Avid/ Premier for doc post producion houses?

    [Andrew Kimery] “why not find an editor you think is a great fit for the project and let them decide which NLE to use?”

    My exact thought also. 😀

    How is it you’re looking for AN NLE and not just simply a qualified editor? The choice of NLE will pretty much decide itself, no? Sounds like Ronny gave you a good place to start, too.

    – RK

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • [Bret Williams] “There was a time, when you could roundtrip to Motion in the same way you can roundtrip in Premiere/AE, but those days are long gone. They went away with FCPX.”

    Not actually true. The only thing that went away, is the SEND TO from the timeline. Aside from that Motion is in fact integrated even much tighter and deeper with FCP X than it ever was with 7.

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

  • First off, you’re sure it has to be AE? Have you ever looked at Motion? Since especially in the context of FCP X, that’s a far better choice in terms of integration. Motion is FCP’s AE. The functional overlap between the two is very big and it’s practically free. If you’re good at AE, Motion shouldn’t have a very steep learning curve.

    Either way, there’s no way you’re simply going to export an XML and have AE open it, no. What you need is Clip Exporter, yes. That will open the XML and create A JAVA SCRIPT which you need to run from within an AE project. Then it should work just fine. I’ve done it many times. Are you sure you’re exporting your PROJECT and not maybe the EVENT? And using all the right settings in CE?

    ____________________________________________________
    Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!

Page 137 of 195

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy