Forum Replies Created

Page 57 of 189
  • Richard Herd

    August 1, 2014 at 8:22 pm in reply to: Switched…then switched back?

    It’s DAW 101. Since STP did this, just copy paste the code into X please. Thanks.

  • Richard Herd

    August 1, 2014 at 7:10 pm in reply to: Switched…then switched back?

    [Charlie Austin] “[Franz Bieberkopf] “[Charlie Austin] “I was actually referring to editing/mixing the actual music”

    Charlie,

    So was I.

    Well then, clearly we are both correct. ;-)”

    That was fun. So in a DAW, we can set the app to auto crossfade when two clips collide. Can X do that?

  • Richard Herd

    July 31, 2014 at 5:31 pm in reply to: Switched…then switched back?

    [Charlie Austin] “Nobody uses “dissolves” editing music, at least nobody I know. It’s all A/B with fine curve control…”

    Maybe they crossfade, though.

  • I know what you mean. The audio tabs. Looks like we are out of luck. I tried prelude and premiere and there does not appear to be a way to access the volume controls in the source monitor. It’s also really bad (to state the obvious) because if the clip is placed in a sequence, and then nested, then the waveform does not show up. I also tried subclipping and subclipping-in-prelude. Nothing seems to allow the controls you’re looking for.

    That’s definitely something to send as feedback to Adobe.

    (edited for clarity)

  • Window > Audio Mixer

  • There doesn’t appear to be any one click workflow. You will probably need to export the sequence; this will create new media that you can import and replace.

  • Sorry I can’t monitor the forum 24-7. I have work to do! 🙂

    Of course you can. Right click the SOURCE MONITOR WINDOW. Choose Audio Gain. Set the level to -96.

    Enjoy the silence.

  • Richard Herd

    July 28, 2014 at 4:36 pm in reply to: Speech analysis concept

    [Michael Phillips] “This is the state of speech to text today, who knows over the next 5-10 years, but many companies have been working on this for the past 50 years.”

    The nature of allophonic representation is such that computers just can’t do it, ever; they cannot computer a meaning. They are not good at inductive reasoning. Humans are great at inductive reasoning.

    If speech recognition were solved via computation, then also video editing would be solved via computation. A bit of reflection and we can see this to be true: phonemes represented as allophones occur in sequences, just like images.

    Speech to text is really a training the computer to match the allophonic representation of a single user (because we all have different shaped mouths and tongues) into the prescribed phonology that corresponds to the prescribed spelling.

    Here is a better example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghoti

  • [Ian Smith] “that everyone can search for and find footage. What are other professionals using, and what is their workflow?”

    From what I can glean, everyone seems to have a different workflow, in the details anyway.

    Ours doesn’t differ much from yours. It appears you will have to force your file naming style into Adobe’s method of Prelude > Batch Rename in Bridge. I think its very clunky, but it would be better to deal with the clunkiness if-and-only-if you can find the footage you need as quickly as you need it when you need it.

    The Adobe website has tutorials and tips.

    Please report back with what your practice is and whether and to what extent it is working for you and any improvements. Thanks!

  • I admit I have never heard of this problem before. I think the person who delivered the files to you made a mistake with their timeline options and export. If you want, I have some time today, I can check out a file. I can be contacted at gmail: richardmarkherd@gmail.com

Page 57 of 189

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy