Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 2
  • Peterson Mark

    April 22, 2011 at 10:23 pm in reply to: The Quadro 4000 can be Gui +GPU Power ?

    “I will try soon and report here about 470 in mac pro.
    My 480 (alone) is twice as fast as gtx285+gt120 at mac pro.”

    How did u do the test to get the result that 480 is twice powered as 285+120?
    Someone on reduser reported 480 is just the same speed as 285, due to the rumor “Half cuda core bug” on Mac.

  • Peterson Mark

    April 13, 2011 at 7:43 am in reply to: bittersweet…

    I believe that
    make the tools ordinary, will help the industry find people who are really extraordinary.

    So, keep hard working…

  • Peterson Mark

    April 11, 2011 at 7:14 pm in reply to: Volumetric light

    The plugin structure always need alot of coding and debugging, and cause system stability issues. Also lots of plugins will make the colorists working in a more confusing enviroment, with clients ask for all kinds of weird idea, which usually they should do in vfx.
    Just a simple opencl accelerated volumetric light effect, is pretty enough.

  • Peterson Mark

    March 31, 2011 at 4:17 pm in reply to: gtx 470

    If u know how things work, hackintosh is faster, more flexible, and reliable enough. If u don’t know, then real Mac crashes all the time.
    30 nodes? That sounds like a vfx shot but not a grading job for me.

  • Peterson Mark

    March 31, 2011 at 2:50 pm in reply to: gtx 470

    [Margus Voll] “Cubix and 2x 4800 or 285 also looks really good to me at the moment.”

    Isn’t it 10 times expense as a single gtx480?

  • Peterson Mark

    March 28, 2011 at 4:15 pm in reply to: gtx 470

    480GTX Works fine, with 2K 1.85 10bits log dpx material, 10-12 full effects nodes (Grading/Curve/PowerWindow/Qualifier/Blur all on) 24fps realtime smoothly.
    Hope the new GTX590 will work, which got 1024 cuda cores, which is a real monster.

    mark

  • Peterson Mark

    March 25, 2011 at 3:45 pm in reply to: A friend for my Wave??

    Hi Josh, have you tried this xkeys pro yet? Isn’t working with Resolve? With the key cover I guess it’s a better one than novation launchpad.

  • Peterson Mark

    March 23, 2011 at 3:51 am in reply to: Moving from Lustre to Davinci

    Switching from 2K to lustre LOG mode grader, really took me a while to feel comfortable, but after that, I found a beautiful world for negative. Of course Video mode grader can do the something, but it’s a different response system inside the colorists. For me personally, I love the log mode.

    If it was true, Blackmagic please bring the LOG mode back, one more option in system setup menu won’t make much confusion.

    Mark

  • Peterson Mark

    March 23, 2011 at 3:42 am in reply to: Moving from Lustre to Davinci

    Hi, I tried your trick, it works, but result is not satisfacted.

    It’s a wide shot, camera moving on track very slowly. I want to add a solid edge shadow on a wall. But whatever I use auto tracker or single point tracking, the shadow jitters. In single point tracking, I select a high contrast point of course.

    Mark

  • Peterson Mark

    March 23, 2011 at 3:26 am in reply to: Moving from Lustre to Davinci

    “Unique” means not typical, not “The One and Only”.
    Before lustre, there was Lift/Gamma/Gain, curves and other control methods, but nothing like this contrast/brightness thing.
    Anyway, industry always going on. LIft gamma gain thing is not bad for digital camera material.

    My thread is looking for colorists who had similar experience transfer from lustre to davinci resolve, as for some reason I need to make this switching done in really short period, and hopefully maintain the quality I can provide to the client.(for both speed and creativity)
    Anyone could help with small tricks or thing to be really care about during this transition, is really appreciated.

    Mark

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy