Paul Del vecchio
Forum Replies Created
-
That’s awesome. Can you import sequences from other projects or do you have to import the entire project?
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
https://www.PaulDV.com -
Have you tried creating a new sequence with the proper settings and cutting and pasting between the two? You could also import or cut and paste the entire project into AE, choose the correct settings in AE and render out OR cut and paste from AE back into a Premiere sequence with the correct settings.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
https://www.PaulDV.com -
What happens if you make the sequence first, then copy from another sequence, go back into the newly created sequence and try to paste? I’d try it myself but I’m not at the office right now.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
That seems to be just the way the program works. The playhead takes a moment to start playing, then the audio/video lags behind the playhead. I wish it was more like Vegas and Avid where the playhead and what you’re hearing/seeing is EXACTLY matched to the playhead.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
Oh I know, Grin. =) I was just looking for something in the film biz. Knowing the absolute minimum helps a bit.
Grin, I saw some pics of your setup. What Avid is that, if you don’t mind me asking.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
There are like 50+ changes to Premiere Pro in CS4. A lot are workflow changes and the workflow changes they added are amazing!
Here’s the list of new stuff:
https://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/features/
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
[Eddie Lotter] “32bit, however it is certified to work on Vista x64, but not XP x64.
Cheers
Eddie “I believe Photoshop is the only application that has been ported over to 64bit.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
[Eric Addison] “I think part of the problem for Adobe is most editors have this really bad Premiere hang over from the old days (anyone remember Premiere 4 or 5?), and just don’t want to even think about using it. They have Avid or FCP and they’re happy. But I really think if they saw what PPro’s like now, and played with it, things could change.
Adobe really has to reach that audience that lost faith in Premiere a long time ago. CS4 looks like a big step in trying to do just that.”
I couldn’t agree with you more, Eric. Premiere is a great editor. At this point, I believe Avid, FCP, and Premiere are all great editors. But yeah, Adobe has to somehow get people to look at Premiere again. I remember talking to a FCP editor and him saying, “I hate Premiere, everything you do, you have to render, render, render.” Not the case anymore. Premiere just got a bad rep from before it was Premiere Pro.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
You know… what’s weird about Sync Lock is that right now, in CS3, Ripple moves ALL tracks. They changed the way the Ripple Tool works it seems. In CS4, the Ripple Tool only effects the track of the clip you are “ripple editing,” whereas in CS3, it would effect ALL tracks. I guess that’s a good and bad thing…
I do like the track targeting though.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net -
Here’s something odd, David. I’m looking at an article on DV.com that shows the timeline window with the track target, but it looks like it’s for the timeline (record) and I don’t see a target for the source (at least, it’s not setup like Avid). But if you go here
https://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/features/?view=topnew
and go to where it says, “EDITING EFFICIENCY” and click on the blue plus sign, you’ll notice that there are no targets to the left of the timeline at all. I’m sure it’s there in the final version, as they stated it’s a new feature, but that screenshot on Adobe’s site is confusing me.
Paul Del Vecchio – Director
http://www.triple-e-productions.net