Forum Replies Created

  • Pam Thompson

    May 4, 2016 at 12:52 am in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    Fabulous! Thank you and Dave and all at Creative Cow for your guidance! It means the world to me and the project!

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 11:26 pm in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    The beauty of working with antiquated systems, someone can lend me a JVC BR-DV600U deck. That will work with the Teranex 2d? Big thank yous!

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 7:44 pm in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    Now this is a stretch but I have a old media 100 system that used pipeline to the deck and had a converter so that provided component output. Can that be rigged to work? Sorry to be, well stupid but I have been out of video world for a long time! I am thinking that the cost of a component deck rental is going to add up quick.

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 7:10 pm in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    Wow! Im taking a deep breath….I just spoke with B&H. They said the Sony DSR 11 has composite that can hook up to Teranex. I understand that composite does not have the quality of component but they said the Teranex would compensate. They don’t even sell component decks anymore. What do You think? I would like to recapture most important footage immediately

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 6:10 pm in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    I have been reading about the Terranex. I currently have a Sony DSR-11 deck and work on a Mac with CatDV and Premier. Adding the Terranex to this system will work or will I need a different deck and additional hardware/software? What happens if the tapes are too old to get capture and I have to use the current digitized material?

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 5:15 pm in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    Well these are great questions that I don’t have answers for yet. The material is a documentary filmed over 7 years on a topic that is now timely. There is 500 hours of digitized (4:3) SD that I thought was digitized as 3:2. I do have access to the tapes, although they are aging. We hope to enter film festivals so we are looking to get the best quality. I welcome any suggestions! Thank you kindly for your time and advice!

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 12:53 pm in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    Overwhelming majority is 640×480. The material is to be combined with HD footage to be shot later this year.

  • Pam Thompson

    May 2, 2016 at 3:08 am in reply to: 640×480 vs 720×480 complication

    Overwhelming majority is 640×480. Eventually I will be editing this old footage with new HD video with it.

  • Pam Thompson

    April 16, 2016 at 10:30 pm in reply to: DV Mini audio compatibility problems

    Hi Nick! Thanks for your feedback. I tried increasing number of tracks but this does not seem to resolve the problem so I took a screen shot with notes. Hopefully the screen shot will post!

  • Pam Thompson

    April 12, 2016 at 8:21 pm in reply to: DV Mini audio compatibility problems

    Hi Nick! Yes the audio does not playback in time line if there are both 32kHz and 48 clips. FCP wants to render timeline first. The rest of your reply goes over my head…I’m short! Also some clips digitized as 31999.4hz and 2Hz. Thank you kindly for your time and advice

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy