Thanks, for the info, guys.
we have some subs already created in FCP7.
we *might* create new ones in FCPX, time will tell
but mainly i’m interested in what happens AFTER the subs are created.
let me outline what we do in FCP7:
after creating the subs, we add a marker for every sub on the clip beneath it, the subtitle text is entered in the marker.
this gives some lee-way when cutting: if we lose the subtitles, or lose sync on them, we can recover.
(we do this by going back to the rushes, finding the relevant spot via reverse match frame,
then copy / pasting the missing subs back to the edit sequence)
we also enter the subtitle text into teh Text generator’s name, with a prefix STL_
this allows us to search for specific text terms, (very handy) and also allows us to do a “find-al” for all subs.
that’s just the preparation,
when it comes to editing, most of our work then needs to be copy and paste from sequence of subtitles rushes into an edit sequence.
obviously the subs don’t follow when you load clips into the viewer.
of course we can also load the subtitled rushes sequence into the viewer and edit from there.
FYI we also have two tracks of sloppy multi cam, which is simplest to not multiclip.
so my main query is how FCPX would compare to this process.
are there some steps we have to do in FCP7 that are now redundant in FCPX?
is there a slicker way to edit subtitled rushes?
can one do a find-all for a specific type of text generator?
i know FCPX can deal with our sloppy multi cam much better than FCP7,
so how much better is it at editing subtitled rushes where the subs are separate strings of text generators?
cheers,
nick