Forum Replies Created

Page 201 of 222
  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 11:45 pm in reply to: the hollywood look

    Frank,
    That post was incredible. Just when I think I’m starting to get the hang of this whole video thing I realize just how little I know. It’s exciting to know that I can do this for the rest of my life and barely scratch the surface. Again, great post.

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 9:00 pm in reply to: Basic Question about Sequences

    Thanks.

    For a while I’ve been thinking about writing a general overview of Avid software–more or less an Intro to Avid. Not an end all user manual by any means, but something that new users of Avid could review to get them started…much like the many video tutorials available here, but as a printable pdf. Avid is such a deep and sometimes complicated program that an easy to understand “Getting Started” manual might be of help. Think it would be worth the time and effort, or is it easier for people to just post here when they have questions?

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 6:31 pm in reply to: Avid Xpress Pro 5.6.1 Readme
  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 4:12 pm in reply to: Basic Question about Sequences

    You wrote: “Logically, I should just pick an editor and run with it rather than spend time evaluating software.”

    I disagree here and think you’re going about it exactly as you should–try every edit system you can get your hands on before you buy. I would never dream of buying an editing system without a test drive–just like I wouldn’t dream of buying a car without putting it through the paces.

    Keep poking around in the Avid and if you know someone with FCP or Premiere sweet talk them into giving you a crash course and some time to play. After trying them all you may end up loving Avid or you may end up hating it. Doesn’t matter what you go with, as long you can get the job done.

    Test all the software you can legally get your hands on before you start spending money. That way you can make an informed decision and will have a system you feel at home on.

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 11:31 am in reply to: Basic Question about Sequences

    arthur144 wrote: “Its not entrely intuitive as your lenghty response suggests.” LOL. It was a rather lengthy response, wasn’t it?

    You’re right though, Avid isn’t as intuitive as many other editing apps. I’ve dabbled in Premiere Pro, FCP, and Media 100 and was up and running rather quickly, I originally but learned to edit on an Avid and have been cutting on an Avid for the two years fulltime.

    It helps to have someone show you the ropes–Avid is an incredibly deep program, but once you quit trying to make it work like another editor it gets easier (and trying to forget everything you’re used to from another editing app is easier said than done!!).

    I would suggest you spend a little more time with it, and remember–when something doesn’t seem to make sense, or you can’t figure something out or just want to know why…post here. There are Avid gurus who haunt these forums (see all their pics at the top) and they’re here to help you progress. It may never be your editor of choice, but it’s well worth it to spend a little more time familiarizing yourself with it.

    Best of luck, post if you have more questions, and happy cutting!

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 12:44 am in reply to: flatten to new layer – leave layers intact

    I haven’t tried this on CS1 or CS2, but it works in Photoshop 7 (yeah, yeah, I know, I need to upgrade). Make a new layer, then Ctrl+Alt+Shift+E. That’s on a PC. I assume it’s Ctrl+Option+Shift+E or something similar on a Mac.

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 28, 2006 at 12:05 am in reply to: Basic Question about Sequences

    Well, you kind of have the right idea. It goes like this:

    The Avid Basics (skip this if you already know it):

    Project–>
    In every project you have Bins, which hold effects, sequences, master clips (for Video, Audio, imported graphics, etc…). Essentially, everything in your project goes into a bin, and you can make as many bins as you want (I don’t think there’s a limit). This helps you organize your footage. You may have one bin for video, one for audio, one for effects, one for titles, one for imported graphics…

    Bins–>
    These hold your master clips, which are pointers to your media files (which are stored on your media drive in a folder called OMFI MediaFiles if you’re dealing with OMF footage, or MXF folders if you’re dealing with MXF). More on media files later. Back to bins.
    You can also store effects in your bins, so if you have an effect you plan on using often you can make a bin for it and stick it in there. You can mix and match anything you want in a bin–you can put sequences in with audio and titles. Bins are like folders in a filing cabinet and allow you to organize your footage, etc…

    Media Files–>
    All of your media is stored in an OMFI MediaFiles folder at the root of your media drives (i.e. M:\OMFI MediaFiles). Avid uses OMF and MXF format–don’t ask me the difference because I don’t know. I use OMF–MXF is (I think) for 10Bit files, HD, etc… When you import an avi or quicktime, Avid converts it to an OMF or MXF file and files it away with all your other media. This is nice because you no longer have to worry about the original file being moved somewhere and losing your link (unless you need to reimport it–then you have to go find it if you’ve moved it. If you haven’t moved it Avid will remember where it was). Avid’s media management is the best in the business.

    Clips–>
    The Audio and Video you capture or import into your system. These can also be imported graphics, titles you make within the Avid, etc…

    In Answer to Your Question about Sequences:

    Sequences–>
    A sequence is your edit, basically. You take your clips, your audio, your graphics, your titles and anything else you want and you put it into a sequence. You can make a sequence as long or as short as you want (although I’ve heard that Avid with Mojo will only play out 3 hours at a time, and Avid with Adrenaline will play 6. I don’t, I haven’t tested it because I don’t have tapes that run that long).
    Sequences can consist of up to (I think) 16 tracks of video and audio on an Xpress Pro system, or 24 tracks of audio and video on Media Composer. Symphony and Nitris–I’m not sure. Of course, once you learn how to nest tracks you’ll soon realize you have an unlimited number of them, but that discussion is for another day.
    How you do your edit is up to you. If you’re doing a short form piece or a commercial for broadcast you’re looking for anything from :10 seconds to 10 minutes or longer. For short pieces like this I use one sequence for my edit. If I decide to play around with the edit but don’t want to lose what I’ve already done I simply select the sequence and hit Ctrl+D to duplicate it. Now I can play in that one without affecting the original. You can make unlimited sequences, allowing you the freedom to try everything under the sun without affecting your original cut.
    For long form pieces (say an hour long short or a 2 hour movie) you might find it beneficial to break each sequence down into a scene. Say this sequence is called Part 1 (how’s that for a generic name?)–this may be everything up until the first commercial break (for an TV show). Edit away. When you want to work on the second part, make a new sequence, called Part 2. When you’re ready to put it all together into one master sequence, do this:
    Take your sequence for Part 1 and drag it from your bin to your Source Monitor (the one on the left). It is now loaded as if it’s a clip. Cut it into a new sequence called Master. Drag Part 2 to your source monitor (or Ctrl+Alt+Double Click to open it in it’s own monitor) and cut that into your Master Sequence, after Part 1. Continue until everything is in order.
    Now some systems allow for nested sequences–Nest Sequence 1 into Sequence 2. Make a change in Sequence 1 and it changes in Sequence 2. Avid doesn’t do this. If you make a change to a sequence the change effects that sequence only.

    That, in a very large nutshell, is the world’s most basic overview of Avid, and how sequences can work for you. Cut everything into one big line, or divide it up by scene and combine them later–the choice is entirely yours. If you have anymore questions, I promise my answer will be shorter and more concise in the future, and if I have mistakes in here other’s will help to correct them.

    Mike.

  • You really don’t want to use your Avid for this. If you simply import the picture the Avid will scale it to fit to 720×486, and scaling it up from there will result in a soft, pixelated, nasty picture. To get a nice quality slide show would require using the Pan and Scan effect for every single picture in order to maintain the picture’s original resolution. That would take a lot of time and be a lot of heartache considering the easier method…

    I see that you have expertise in After Effects: Use this program if it’s available to you. As matter of fact, check the following link out and your slideshow will be done in about 5 minutes.

    https://forums.creativecow.net/articles/kramer_andrew/slideshows/slideshow.htm

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 26, 2006 at 1:32 pm in reply to: Color correction

    Avid effects work top-down, and if an effect is not the only effect on a clip or is not a nested effect it affects all the layers below it. If you’re familiar with After Effects, it’s kind of like each layer can act as an adustment layer–great sometimes, and royal pain in the neck other times.

    As far as color correcting a clip, Amheus is right, though, just step into your effect and apply your CC effect (oddly enough, double clicking it in segment mode to expand the track won’t allow you to add a CC effect–it gives an error message–you have to step in for a CC effect).

    Mike.

  • Michael Hancock

    September 26, 2006 at 1:54 am in reply to: Avid recapturing to full resolution

    James,
    I think bouke misunderstood what you said (as did I under I read MichaelP’s post). In your original post you said you were capturing from 15:1 to 25:1–read literally it would be capturing from a 15:1 compression to a 25:1 compression–not good! If that’s really what you wanted to do, just transcode your footage. Now, if you were going from 15:1s to DV25 (as MichaelP assumed, and I’m guessing rightly so) then you’re coming back to more of an online resolution. I think that’s where the confusion is about capturing to a lower rez.

    You said you captured everything via firewire. Did you bring it in in big chunks? Firewire, from what I’ve seen (and experienced once or twice) is notorious for slipping a little off track when you’re bringing in huge clips. I’ve found it’s much safer to bring in smaller chunks of 5, 10, maybe 15 minutes rather than trying to capture a whole tape.

    Have you tried subclipping a few of your bigger chunks and just redigitizing those, as a tester? Are they still off? If so, by how much? Is it consistent? If it’s off by a consistent amount changing everything won’t be so bad–a little time consuming, but just slip the shot “x” number of frames, go to the next shot, slip it, etc…

    Otherwise, I’m not sure what to tell you other than best of luck–let us know if you figure it out!

    Mike.

Page 201 of 222

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy