Michael Becke
Forum Replies Created
-
Thanks for the tip
-
Thanks for all the replies, I got the solution to the problem from “Sam mltn’s” post:
Try changing the Z orientation then rotate on X and it will work. it would be nice if there was a way to change the render order like you can do in card dance so Z would render before X but as it is the order is orientation, x, y, then z. that’s why you have to use orientation
I basically had many layers… and wanted them all to rotate around there own x-axis when I rotate the null object. Changing the orientation before as he says above makes sure they rotate on the local axis instead of the world axis.
Cheers
-
Thanks for all the replies, I got the solution to the problem from “Sam mltn’s” post:
Try changing the Z orientation then rotate on X and it will work. it would be nice if there was a way to change the render order like you can do in card dance so Z would render before X but as it is the order is orientation, x, y, then z. that’s why you have to use orientation
I basically had many layers… and wanted them all to rotate around there own x-axis when I rotate the null object. Changing the orientation before as he says above makes sure they rotate on the local axis instead of the world axis.
Cheers
-
Thanks for the feedback Steve, I thought there might not be an easy workaround… maybe we’ll get an insightful post 😉
Thanks again,
Michael -
Thanks for the feedback Steve, I thought there might not be an easy workaround… maybe we’ll get an insightful post 😉
Thanks again,
Michael -
Thanks for the feedback Steve, I thought there might not be an easy workaround… maybe we’ll get an insightful post 😉
Thanks again,
Michael -
Thanks for the feedback Steve, I thought there might not be an easy workaround… maybe we’ll get an insightful post 😉
Thanks again,
Michael -
I’m not sure what you mean, so I’ll check with you.
You have multiple photos. (which don’t fill the screen > look like they’re floating/sitting in the composition)
You have them moving/rotating on the screen.
You plan to sequentially show different photos by cross dissolving. (does it look like a stack of photos? ie. you would be able to see the corners of the photo below past the edges of the photo above?)Maybe more questions later.
Cheers,
Michael -
I’m not sure what you mean, so I’ll check with you.
You have multiple photos. (which don’t fill the screen > look like they’re floating/sitting in the composition)
You have them moving/rotating on the screen.
You plan to sequentially show different photos by cross dissolving. (does it look like a stack of photos? ie. you would be able to see the corners of the photo below past the edges of the photo above?)Maybe more questions later.
Cheers,
Michael -
Michael Becke
December 1, 2006 at 10:01 am in reply to: Animating the same graphic – but at a larger resolution?I thought this may be the case and thianks for the input. 🙂