Small thread-jacking for something Todd said:
We often get the call “Have you ever worked for a ….” with the potential client asking ONLY about their particular line of work, even though from a visual and storyteller sense many others are virtually the same. But virtually the same is not the same as the same, and some people just can’t see it.
So VERY true, whatever segment of the biz you’re in. If you’re a carpenter, they’ll ask you: “Do you use a BLUE hammer?” And you say; “My hammer is red, but it’s the right weight and type for this job, which I have done three hundred times, with a list of happy customers a mile long.” “Oh, no, ” they come back: “We were really looking for blue-hammer-wielding types only for this; the job we based everything on used a blue hammer, sorry. You’re welcome to bid again when you get pro stuff.”
I don’t know what tropism is at work here, but it seems that there is always someone high up the approval chain who is completely lacking the ability to conceptualize, to imagine, to extrapolate. Invariably, they at some point have to okay your project, but won’t pay for anything they can’t see. And you can’t make the product until somebody pays for it. Mock-ups and demos might help, but as often, I find, create new problems because the unimaginative person will invariably fixate on some tiny, irrelevant detail in the mock-up that won’t be in the final anyway.
I feel the need to watch this again, suddenly….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!
This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.