Margus Voll
Forum Replies Created
-
In a one way color has been really nice tool at its price point.
Resolve has just so much more to offer.
I think in a week one should be able to swap. In two weeks run or fly after you have
the idea what you are doing.—
Margus
-
As far as i have seen Canon material runs really smoothly.
RED suport is even cooler when you have rocket.From fcp to Resolve it goes really silky.
Edit in fcp, export edl, import edl and whoom your done.
Just in seconds.Really cool thing is conform with different versions.
Lets say client makes really last minute changes.
You just export new edl, import, whoom you have diferent version.
And it is really simple to swich between versions while you work.I have had real pain with Color if client wants to change stuff.
—
Margus
-
Why one would want to use color after resolve ?
Speed flexibility etc is so much more that i see no reason to struggle.
Even if there is a bit investment in tech involved.—
Margus
-
Hi.
120 is for gui only second card is for RT.
For example like computer games. Some parts are for gui some are core rendering in hardware.
This what CUDA gpu does (285 or 4800).
—
Margus
-
-
-
Or you could add grain later after all is done ?
I mean in the other app
Maybe you could post some sample grain then some other people could test it out ? 🙂
—
Margus
-
-
I think in the end what matters is the control and speed you get from your board.
Tangent cant beat full board on that.
I’m reading old manual and it is really impressive how much control you have
with dedicated buttons.—
Margus
-
Exactly my point.
When grading feature etc you want speed and audio.
Client wants to see all stuff now not in hour or so.
—
Margus