Forum Replies Created

Page 6 of 19
  • Hi Adam,

    Thank you for your thoughts.

    If I removed the 3 duplicate “freeze” frames from the middle of the pan and closed the gap, then it would create a jump cut, but perhaps it would look better than having the pan pause at the 3 duplicate freeze frames.

    Khashyar

    Producer-Director
    Wakan Films
    Hollywood, CA
    http://www.wakan.com

  • As I was searching online, another issue to bridge the gap if the three freeze frames were removed from the pan is to use a FCP morph plugin to recreate the 3 freeze frames (once the freeze frames are removed).

    I also read that After Effects could recreate the frames, but I am looking for a way to do this within Final Cut.

    Thank you for your thoughts and ideas.

    Producer-Director
    Wakan Films
    Hollywood, CA
    http://www.wakan.com

  • Just to add more information, I discovered a forum thread where multiple 5D owners who had the same periodic 3 frame freeze issue:

    https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-5d-mk-ii-mk-iii-hd/488616-still-getting-duplicated-frames-5d-mk-ii.html

    Producer-Director
    Wakan Films
    Hollywood, CA
    http://www.wakan.com

  • One possible solution, which may be an action of last resort, is to cut 2 or 3 seconds from the pan with a short dissolve, so that the dissolved clip ends aren’t close enough to look like a jump cut…

    But, I would really like to find a way to save the entire pan (minus the 3 duplicate frames).

    Thank you for your thoughts.

    Producer-Director
    Wakan Films
    Hollywood, CA
    http://www.wakan.com

  • Hi Daniel,

    I appreciate your thoughts and suggestions.

    Yes, Prores proxy could have been an option.

    HD Prores Proxy bitrate is 45 Mbps, and DV SD Bitrate is 3.6 Mbps.

    But, for this film, we are working with about 500 hours of HD footage, and we have a 9TB RAID, so we would not have enough space for 500 hours of 1080i prores proxy.

    Thanks again for your thoughts and input.

    Khashyar

  • In case anyone was wondering why we are downconverting 1080i to 480i…

    We are editing a feature documentary film with about 500 hours of 1920×1080 footage, and even with the 9TB RAID that we have, that is not enough close to the space we need.

    So, we decided to do an offline edit in SD, with all of the 500 hours of footage converted to SD able to fit on our 9TB RAID.

  • I finally found a solution and the right settings in MPEG Streamclip for an accurate conversion from 1920x1080i Quicktime to 720×480 Apple DV.

    In the spirit of helping anyone else who is frustrated and unsure of how to address the black side bar issue, here are the settings that I used that worked in my case:

    (Some of these are obvious, but I’m including them just to be thorough)

    1) “Compression”: Apple DV/DVCPRO –
    NTSC

    2) in “Options” choose “Interlaced” and “16:9”

    3) “Quality”: I choose “100%”

    4) check the “Cropping” box

    5) Under “Cropping,” choose “Scale”

    6) Under “Cropping,” for “Left” enter “9,” and for “Right” enter “8” (I don’t know why the pixels aren’t the same width, but I tested outputs with several pixel cropping variables, and these seem correct and remove the all of the black side pixel bars, and in my observation, no image pixels.

    Below is the information from the MPEG Streamclip manual regarding the Cropping feature:

    Cropping
    With this feature, you can crop any edge of the frame: you just have to enable it and
    enter the amount of pixels you want to crop from each edge. Even numbers are
    preferred. Negative numbers are allowed: in most cases, they will add a black border to
    the picture.
    You can choose between three different cropping modes: “Destination”, “Source”,
    “Scale”.
    With “Destination” (the default mode), cropping is relative to pixels in the destination
    movie, and the frame size of the resulting movie will be changed.
    With “Source”, cropping is relative to pixels in the source movie; the frame size of the
    resulting movie will not be changed, and the picture is stretched to fit the destination
    frame size.
    With “Scale”, cropping is relative to pixels in the destination movie; the frame size of the
    resulting movie will not be changed, and the picture is stretched to fit the destination
    frame size.
    Note however that If you choose the “Destination” cropping mode with a DV frame size,
    MPEG Streamclip will use “Scale” instead.

  • I was just reading the manual for MPEG Streamclip, and there is a “Scale” feature in the “Cropping” option, where you can remove pixel lines from either or all of the four corners of the image, and then the image will be stretched to maintain the designated end dimension…

    I just have to guess (or use trial and error) to determine exactly how many black pixels are on each side…

    I hope this might help someone else who is experiencing the same issue.

  • One more question…

    Does MPEGStreamClip do a professional job of MP4 h.264 conversion?

    Or, does Compressor produce higher quality results?

    Thank you again.

    Khashyar

  • Thank you for your thoughts and feedback, Craig.

    That’s excellent advice about converting it to .mp4… I was going to create a Quicktime file.

    Is there a link to more detailed Compressor specs for converting video for consumer download?

    I just want to make sure and get it right…. I had a hard time finding detailed specs when I was searching.

    I appreciate your feedback.

    Khashyar

Page 6 of 19

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy