Good call about the client monitor (I am working on a dual monitor system). Thanks for that one.
So, I’ve TEDIOUSLY spent the entire day comparing every sort of export I could, and I’ve compiled them below. After AMAing, I changed the source files to the 0-255 setting and then transcoded to DNxHD 115 (hence the “expand tra” text). All vids had FFs with other import and transcode methods, but I thought I’d start with this (I think it will give adequate results).
I compared:
converted to h264 and x264 in Mpeg Streamclip – QTref 709, QTref 709 Avid codecs, QTref RGB, QTref RGB Avid codecs
AVID h264 709, AVID h264 RGB
AVID x264 709, AVID x264 RGB .
All files were viewed in QT 10 (I’ve found it does an adequate job predicting youtube) and compared to the AVID viewer. I looked at her face color, hair color, vest darkness/detail, and railing color.
All the matters to me here is perceived accuracy–so no concern about scopes and things. My favorite? AVID x264 709, though it desaturates a touch and lightens the blacks a smidge. What do you guys think?


Video editor, animator, composer, producer
SarasotaTheBand.com