Forum Replies Created
-
Juan Salvo
June 26, 2013 at 5:09 pm in reply to: Apple Pro Res 4444 video looks different outside of Davinci[james Lackleter] “Unfortunately I only have a 27 inch Imac, which I calibrated the best I could”
Unfortunately, right now Resolve’s GUI image is not color accurate. One of the features in V10 will be the application of a GUI lut, which make it possible to calibrate the GUI display. But that’s V10, V9 requires video IO.
color/post/workflow
https://JuanSalvo.com -
[chris karcher] “Yes, we updated to 9.1.4 but still get some flashes. It drove us a little crazy on a 9 minute 4K video we recently finished.”
You’re using Titan and 9.1.4? There are two know issues which result in random black frames.1) was a bug with large LUTs in the node tree, on kepler GPU cards (680/690)
2) Is a card without enough RAM to store a large image (680 2GB, 690s)… this would tend to occur much less frequently.Issue #1 was fixed with 9.1.4. Issue #2 should not affect the Titans. Are you sure you were processing on Titans and only with Titans? Did you enable the new “use GUI card for processing” function per chance?
color/post/workflow
https://JuanSalvo.com -
Juan Salvo
June 25, 2013 at 7:12 pm in reply to: Apple Pro Res 4444 video looks different outside of DavinciWelcome to the wonderful world of color management. Are you evaluating your image on an external monitor. connected through a video IO?
color/post/workflow
https://JuanSalvo.com -
Different dongles. But they can run on the same machine. Though certain cards/devices aren’t supported in windows version.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
They are indeed them.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Neither of those are very good. Sony has just posted new LUTs to their site. They’ve also added LUT export capabilities to their RAW Viewer software.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Sizing in PrP works differently than anywhere else. It seems to be absolute, not relative. Others may have better advise for you. But mine would be to ignore all the PrP sizing, and do it yourself in Resolve.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Well “too much” is a bit subjective. The big issue with the new MacPro is that there is 0 expandability. That’s it, what you buy is what you get. So while performance will be great for 95% of the work that people do in resolve, if you want to ever do that 5% work… I imagine you’d need to get into Linux anyway.
But it’s always great that we have choices. And the new MacPro will be an excellent choice for I’d say most Resolve users. It’s just that any improvements will have to come through updates. Hopefully Apple sets a pattern of updating every 12-18 months like they did with the prior MacPro… Until they didn’t, that is.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
I think the linux machines will still come out ahead. Though the new MacPros will certainly be solid machines for mainstream applications, you’ll want the robustness and capabilities of a Linux config for things like DI and stereoscopic/HFR work.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Just to be clear when it comes to DNxHD i prefer to not use an MOV container.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author