[Marc Wielage] ”
I don’t think the Eizo’s color navigator is good enough for Rec709 (broadcast) or for cinema distribution.”
When I think about the amount of energy released into the environment in that brief period of time when “film vs. digital video” dominated the discussion; now that it is settled, I’m hoping that Climate Change will start decelerating any time now, because it has to have been a factor.
But lets talk about densitometry. When you try to make “black” on a white or silvery, reflective screen, that’s really where the rubber meets the road. Emissive vs. reflective are so fundamentally different, the only hope is for a reasonable compromise. Any colorist who has spent any time at all trying to get a black balance knows there can be a lot more going on between “0” and “1”, than there is between “1” and 100.” Thats just how it is, and in the digital world, that infinity of random noise, quantization error and other minute factors are just below the radar. Now lets toss in a gamut LUT, and probably re-range the RGB / Rec709 mapping across the grey scale. You start wondering how any of this could possibly work, even at a “good enough” level. Practically speaking, if enough small errors creep in, it won’t. That’s why it costs a bit more to acquire equipment that can achieve the sensitivity, repeatability and accuracy that keeps those factors at bay. The ones you can’t even see, the monitor can’t display it, the (consumer) densitometer isn’t registering it, and then its obvious when it hits the theatre screen or home receiver that is cranked up to BestBuy Sales Demo mode.
jPo
“I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.