Jose Lomeña
Forum Replies Created
-
PCIe2 with 16lanes is enough for sure… I think with pcie2 x8 you will have near same performance with resolve because the bandwidth is enough for 5k at least at 24fps. What you need is more Cuda Cores for processing, and with 1500 it will be 3x faster than gtx580… no more Gui card… :-). I think this card will be the standard gpu for resolve lite 🙂
The question is, will be drivers for this beast, or we need to wait 2 more years?…
-
Why not easydcp player?
-
Hi Toby, eye one is a probe that need calibration after some measurements. For a full profile you need more than 30min, and I think this is too much for eye one. You can get a profile, but the question is, will it be better or worst than native calibration?…
In the other hand, probes like i1D3 has better over time measurements and can read 0.01cd. If your program can generate a profile matrix to i1D3 from eye one pro, like calman, I recommend you this way. i1D3 is really cheap, and if you generate the right matrix from eyeone it will very accurate. But I don’t know for sure if i1D3 can work with Oled Refresh rate.
-
I tested this monitor and I recorded a video, results was like a crt, with the same banding refresh issue.
I think not any calibrator can work with this monitor. I think you need to have sync between both.
In the other hand, eye one pro is not so good with low IRE or high contrast monitors like this. I recommend more expensive colorimeters…
-
You need a special screen that retain polarization, like silver screen from stewart or dalite…
Pasive 3d is better than shutter, you have less headache and a lot more light output. I think rs35 can be better for dci. But rs65 is eassier to adjust convergence. I recommend you to try screen fabric before buy, i really hate silver screens.
-
Jose Lomeña
December 17, 2011 at 10:32 am in reply to: You don’t need a Davio and you don’t need an HD link – perfect REC 709 with just a consumer plasmaThe actual eyeonepro is not the same than 6 years ago, there are different revision. The only problem of eyeonepro is the slow read and low light, but not accuracy.
For a greyscale accuracy you don’t need too much… the problem is with colors and gamut.
At least me I can see a lot difference when I set output of davinci sdi at 8 bit or 10 bit, don’t you?. I can see the difference in my plasma, crt, and lcd. What I’m doing wrong?
-
Jose Lomeña
December 17, 2011 at 8:32 am in reply to: You don’t need a Davio and you don’t need an HD link – perfect REC 709 with just a consumer plasmaWith 8bit you can’t know if banding is from grading or from monitor or lut or calibration or… I think you need to monitor as better as you can, and in the end mastering down to 8bit, pal, web, etc…
In the other hand, i1 display cant do <1 dE across de board. Only a spectometre can do that… Or expensive colorimeters with recalibration over time.
The basic problem is that colorimeter has an internal table that maybe is not accurate enought for dE1… If you want a real dE <3 across the board you need at least eyeonepro… -
Jose Lomeña
December 16, 2011 at 5:12 pm in reply to: You don’t need a Davio and you don’t need an HD link – perfect REC 709 with just a consumer plasmaWith 2 monitors, you can use Lut from decklink preference panel for hdmi out… and don’t use resolve lut. And the other SDI out to any Calibrated monitor, or a hdlink.
-
Jose Lomeña
December 16, 2011 at 9:52 am in reply to: You don’t need a Davio and you don’t need an HD link – perfect REC 709 with just a consumer plasmaThanks for the info… But…
Delta E of 0 is impossible with a colorimeter like i1 display… At least across the board…
-
but the stability problem is only with plasma?…
I was refering to what problem of stability do you have with LcOS projectors?.
Recalibration after a month is not a problem (for me), but recalibration after an hour can be an issue.