Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 3
  • Jonathan Young

    December 30, 2015 at 12:22 am in reply to: Wireless lavalier noise

    Ok the frequencies for both of my sets are Sennheiser G2 range 626-662 I guess I need to understand white space and how to look up what channels and frequencies that are available in certain areas, to avoid that interference what do you call that noise that I am hearing?

  • Jonathan Young

    May 8, 2013 at 3:05 am in reply to: Question about HD title I made in FCP

    Yes motion render settings in FCP is set to BEST

  • Jonathan Young

    May 7, 2013 at 8:00 pm in reply to: Question about HD title I made in FCP

    Ok, I thought I was correct, I had two of the same projects, one in HD and one in SD, the client wanted to know why the EXACT same title looked less crisp and sharp than the HD project, I told him it was because one was HD and one was SD, I originally created the SD tile in the 853X480 settings and it was looking washed out compared to the HD version so he asked if I could take the HD title and drop it into the SD project and the results were the same, but he still insist that I must be doing something wrong, I knew I was right when I told him no matter what I do the SD project text wise will never match the HD project quality wise. He then asked me to create the titles in after affects and bring them into FCP, I knew before I did it that it would not make a difference, but I did it anyway and same results. So know I think he wants me to do the both projects in Premiere Pro CS6, but as long as we are doing HD to SD even in Premiere Pro the quality in text will be the same correct?

  • Jonathan Young

    May 7, 2013 at 4:11 pm in reply to: Question about HD title I made in FCP

    Yes, I forgot to mention that I am using a ProRes codec and not a DV codec and it still looks washed out, my seq compressor settings are ProRes and I am exporting the video with the ProRes compression through quicktime conversion.

  • Jonathan Young

    March 30, 2013 at 10:58 pm in reply to: Quick question about pillarboxing HD

    Sorry for not being specific, these will go on his website, and although they are SD 4:3 he wants them to be in a 16:9 shaped player that’s those dimensions (640X360, 720X480) I think what I will do is just put them in a 16X9 sequence and send them to compressor to get the two sizes he wants.

  • Jonathan Young

    March 14, 2013 at 5:23 pm in reply to: Question about formating MP4 and H.264

    Ok, the only reason I using this set up was because I have about 65 one hour videos that he wants encoded and I was using my mac pro to batch encode compress these and I was able to use qmaster and use 4 of my 8 cores to encode the videos.
    I noticed my qmaster would not work with my compressor 4 that I have.
    Is there another software that will allow me to batch encode compress and will do this in the h.264 mp4 wrapper?
    I also own Adobe CS6 so maybe their media encoder? I like compressor because of the qmaster able to use multiple cores to encode compress,

    but even if I do use another program to give me the h.264 in the mp4 wrapper, will it still only work on version 12 of WMP?
    thanks, your answers are really helpful.

  • Jonathan Young

    March 14, 2013 at 5:00 pm in reply to: Question about formating MP4 and H.264

    I am using compressor 3, so are you saying that my settings in 3 are wrong for what the client wants to do? thanks

  • Jonathan Young

    February 28, 2013 at 5:33 am in reply to: Quick aspect ratio question

    Ok that worked but why when I choose the 720X480 (another final output that the client wants from the 1920X1080 master)if I use the square pixel option for aspect ratio the final video comes out looking more 4:3 but when I add the 16:9 anamorphic setting to the aspect ratio it comes out looking fine. but when I add the 16:9 anamorphic setting to the aspect ratio of the 640X360 I get the video that turns into 540X360 with the green vertical bar on the right hand side of the player?
    What I am trying to say is why does the 720X480 have to have a 16:9 anamorphic pixel aspect ratio to come out correct but the 640X360 have to have the square pixel aspect ratio to come out correct.

    Thanks

  • Jonathan Young

    February 26, 2013 at 3:49 am in reply to: Pillarboxing question

    No he said no letter box (black on top and bottom) I told him what he wants cant be done, I just wanted to double check, he is acting like I don’t know what im talking about and he thinks it can be done.

  • Jonathan Young

    September 23, 2011 at 3:00 am in reply to: Streaming live video with Sony EX-1

    What if I used something like a Panasonic DVX100 or HVX200 that does SD?

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy