Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 10
  • Jeff Handy

    July 26, 2012 at 1:52 pm in reply to: Mountain Lion and PPro CS6

    Saw this addressed on another forum, though I don’t recall which one. YMMV and I haven’t upgraded, so I can’t really test it.

    Go to /Library/Frameworks/CUDA.framework/Versions/A/Libraries

    duplicate “libcuda_295.10.15.dylib”

    and then name it:

    libcuda_295.30.00.dylib

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    July 25, 2012 at 6:52 pm in reply to: Mountain Lion and PPro CS6

    I wonder if it’ll have any effect on CUDA drivers.

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    April 21, 2012 at 2:01 pm in reply to: Trasnfer via Ethernet

    “My question, on the Rack, can you transfer off of one drive while the other is recording via ethernet?”

    That’s a great question and makes a lot of sense. Better yet, why not open an FTP port and have people avoid the use of the web interface altogether for file transfer?

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    April 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm in reply to: Trasnfer via Ethernet

    Same here, but our Ki Pro systems are always recording in the studio. We have a ton of the drives and we just swap as needed. I do like the new rack system. I can see our next two systems being those.

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    April 20, 2012 at 6:27 pm in reply to: Trasnfer via Ethernet

    I’m curious why you’d do this rather than a direct FW800 transfer from the drive. If one could do the transfer during recording, I could see the advantage. But it doesn’t look like that’s possible.

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    April 14, 2012 at 5:39 pm in reply to: Questions for CS6

    I’ve tried dealing with the devil using CS 5.5, which also “should” have worked. If no baseline changes were made to file handling, I’m not sure how that could have been addressed. I’ll be interested to get my hands on a trial copy, though – especially since my testing with 5.5 went so poorly. If it’s more of the same, I’ll probably continue the trend of warming up to FCP X.

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    October 3, 2011 at 7:12 pm in reply to: Final Cut Server Migration Tool

    Very cool, Matt. This will make a lot of FCsvr shops happy. Have you posted this at XSANity as well?

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    June 23, 2011 at 12:34 am in reply to: MC 5 and XSAN 2 – will they blend?

    That’s a thought too. Funny thing is that our first SAN install was ImageSAN. Back then, they were the only game in town for file-level locking. But it was crap and I’m not sure I’d go back. 😉

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    June 23, 2011 at 12:33 am in reply to: MC 5 and XSAN 2 – will they blend?

    Thanks, Bob. Premiere is on my short list for sure. OTOH, the brass might appreciate the simplicity Avid offers and opt to oust the lot. I’ll give them the options and they’ll decide. Avid = starting from scratch, Premiere = leveraging sunk costs.

    HandyGeek

  • Jeff Handy

    June 22, 2011 at 6:37 pm in reply to: MC 5 and XSAN 2 – will they blend?

    And to clarify – yes, I’m considering not only a change of editing tool, but also the sharing, versioning and MAM functions that Final Cut Server was beginning to provide.

    HandyGeek

Page 3 of 10

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy