…but with Intel happening early next year the quad doesn’t add up for me.
===
It’s likely we won’t get Intel Powermacs until January of 2007. I certainly wouldn’t worry about what’s coming in 14 months when buying a computer. One could get a lot of work done in 14 months with a computer bought now. Not to mention that in 14 months we’ll all be looking forward to what’s coming out in 2008. There will always be something just around the corner, eventually you have to just jump on the train and hope for the best.
(And the 14-month number even assumes one would want to buy an Intel Powermac ASAP. I imagine most Final Cut users will wait for other early adopters to shake out the bugs.)
As you can tell, Michael, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with your iedea. If anything, I would suggest going with the dual-2.3 chip instead of the quad. You said you’d be working on short projects, correct? The biggest advantage to getting a faster computer is the render/compression times. Now, I don’t know what you mean by “short,” but if they’re under a certain length the difference in render times might not be worth the money.
In other words, a faster machine might knock 20 minutes off the render of a full-length movie, but it would only save 20 second off the render of a 30 second spot. I don’t know what you’re working on, but it’s possible that having the maximum speed chip isn’t worth the extra price. Put the money into more RAM or something.
Anyway, the short answer is I think your idea is fine. The long answer is: Tell us more about what you do and we can give even better advice as to what you should look at.