Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 5
  • James_j

    January 7, 2008 at 2:54 am in reply to: Render question

    Yes, it can matter. But you’re pretty safe if you use the presets.

    We use the DVD presets for most of our stuff (modified to CBR), but when we need to show it on the web we’ll use .wmv. I honestly can’t tell you what these presets do with interlacing and I really don’t care.

    Obviously, if you knew the exact display method you could customize more, but I doubt you’ll see any great improvement.

  • James_j

    September 20, 2007 at 12:57 am in reply to: question about very low quality 😉

    You can’t just make up DVD resolutions as you go. They have very strict standards.

    Two options quickly come to mind:
    *) Stretch to PAL 720X576 using track motion
    *) Matte

    Or try burning an mpeg file to a data DVD at your resolution and see if your DVD player will play it. Some might.

  • James_j

    September 20, 2007 at 12:53 am in reply to: Dual Core Used Effectively?

    There aren’t two separate processes, but you should clearly see both cores being used. I don’t think they’ll be at 100% because there’s overhead.

    Been a while since I used Vegas6, but I know with 7 it’s so aggressive I use Process Tamer to kick it down to Low priority. It sits at about 98-100% usage.

  • James_j

    April 25, 2007 at 12:55 am in reply to: rendering questions

    I can’t imagine why they would decide to strip off markers by default,
    but I’m willing to modify the script if that’s what it takes.

    I have Batch Render.cs from Vegas6 here, so I did a compare to the V7 script. Lots of differences, but nothing that mentions ‘set this to on to save markers’. In fact, the word ‘mark’ doesn’t appear in the script at all.

    So I’m at a loss. I’m competent enough to make code changes, but right now I have no idea what to change. Maybe there’s a scripting forum somewhere?

  • James_j

    April 24, 2007 at 2:58 am in reply to: rendering questions

    I didn’t really want to hear this is a problem with Vegas itself. Or rather, with the scripting engine.

    Now I’m wondering which it is. Are you saying that sometimes even if you render an mpg2 manually, you get no chapter markers? Yikes.

  • James_j

    April 23, 2007 at 11:47 pm in reply to: rendering questions

    Oddly, that fixed the audio problem. I can’t imagine why.

    But why is it dumping my chapter markers?

  • James_j

    April 23, 2007 at 2:55 pm in reply to: rendering questions

    Oops, I didn’t create a new audio preset, I’m just choosing the included 5.1 Surround selection. Although I can’t find any VU meters in DVDA(?), by ear I’d say the output is halved. It’s pretty clear graphically on the timeline in DVDA as well.

    Makes no sense since the audio is fine if I manually render it using the same template. But then, so are the chapter markers.

    I’m no expert at coding, but looking at the included (V7) batch render script the word ‘chapter’ doesn’t appear. Is this just a glaring error that can be corrected easily? Or is there a better batch render script floating around?

  • James_j

    June 28, 2006 at 3:13 am in reply to: jerking montage

    As GK said, it’s likely just a preview issue. Render will be fine.

    If you can’t see the whole pic, just zoom out. Obviously you’ll have borders on some pics – especially the vertical ones – but you can add a background to a lower track. And add a drop shadow using track motion.

  • James_j

    June 26, 2006 at 3:01 pm in reply to: Pause then zoom

    Note also this effect is much easier if you start with higher res video (eg HDV). If you try to zoom very much into SD video, it can look awful.

    Of course, there are tricks to get around this.

  • James_j

    June 26, 2006 at 2:58 pm in reply to: “Render As” (details inside)

    To expand on Gary’s answer:

    I wouldn’t settle for a capture at that low a resolution (320X240). If you intend to make a DVD (720X480) out of it, it’s going to look terrible.

    If you can’t find a setting somewhere in your ‘TV input device’ to get 640X480, you’re going to have to consider a different method. Like he said, if you have to, borrow a miniDV camera and use that to convert – at least it’ll get your capture to 720X480.

    PS I know nothing about 8mm analog video, but I just can’t imagine it was ever limited to a resolution that low.

Page 1 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy