Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 17
  • Jack Fox

    April 19, 2009 at 6:17 pm in reply to: Sound problems after conversion to mpe2

    Okay, I changed the maximum bit rate (20 to 32), and that helped. Now I have a few skips in the first couples seconds, during the bars and tone, and that’s it. Thanks. Why I’m having any problem with the audio is still a mystery.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    April 18, 2009 at 7:46 pm in reply to: Sound problems after conversion to mpe2

    Tried streamclip, same problem.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    April 18, 2009 at 12:41 pm in reply to: Sound problems after conversion to mpe2

    It plays fine in the timeline, but the same problem is experienced by all computers after conversion. My concern is my computer not having enough horsepower during conversion. Is there a way to make an mpeg2 file without compression the sound. The project is a standard definition TV show. (see conversion details below)

    jmf

    Name: Program Stream
    Description: MPEG-2 Program Stream with MPEG audio at 48 kHz. Settings based off the source resolution and frame-rate.
    File Extension: mpeg
    Estimated file size: 3.24 GB
    Type: MPEG-2 program stream
    Video Encoder
    Format: M2V
    Width: 720
    Height: 480
    Pixel aspect ratio: NTSC CCIR 601/DV
    Crop: None
    Padding: None
    Frame rate: 29.97
    Frame Controls: Automatically selected: Off
    Start timecode: 00:00:00:00
    Aspect ratio: 4:3
    Field dominance: Progressive
    Average data rate: 15 (Mbps)
    2 Pass VBR enabled
    Maximum data rate: 20 (Mbps)
    High quality
    Best motion estimation
    Closed GOP Size: 15, Structure: IBBP
    Audio Encoder
    Format: MPEG
    Sample Rate: 48.000kHz
    Channels: 2
    Bits Per Sample: 16

  • Jack Fox

    April 5, 2009 at 12:38 am in reply to: Mpeg-2 settings for PBS TV

    Okay, I will start with full quality (40 mbps) and see what the presenting station suggests.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    February 27, 2009 at 1:37 pm in reply to: DVCPro 25

    Why are the blanks so much more expensive compared to the miniDV blanks I use to record the show? Why are the $4 miniDV tapes good enough to transport the media but I need a tape worth 30 times more to deliver the show to the uplink house?

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    February 8, 2009 at 2:51 am in reply to: Same old timing issue

    I think my show is 26:46 and it is, but my timecode (after conversion) suggests it is longer, which it is not. I do understand that 23.98 is short for 23.976, but I’m wondering if some software has rounded up. When I put a timecode track on the media before exporting I get the same timecode that is shown in the FCP timeline after export to quicktime movie, even though the frames and timecode detected on playing is displayed as longer (aproximately 6 frames). The difference between the original (40702) and the export (40708) on a 28:15:22 sequence is the same ratio as that of 23.976 and 23.98.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    January 29, 2009 at 10:32 pm in reply to: Applying Kona to a 23.98 project

    Shane,

    You said 23.98 is non-drop only, then why does the calculator that you recommend have a 23.98 drop option? I wonder if there are any other people or devices making the same mistake.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    January 29, 2009 at 9:47 pm in reply to: Applying Kona to a 23.98 project

    Thanks for the homework assignment Mark.

    The difference I am seeing is the same difference between non-drop and drop frame.* Looking at my FCP timeline sequence settings, I see the drop option is grayed out in the “Timeline Options” tab. It would appear that the timeline is non-drop frame and quicktime is drop frame. This sounds like a break through but does not explain the frame count difference.

    *If I put 28:45;23 as non-drop frame in the the calculator that Shane recommended, and convert to drop frame I get exactly the timing shown by quicktime by one frame (28:47;16).

    If this is the problem, the next question is how to change the fcp sequence to drop frame or quicktime to non-drop frame.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    January 29, 2009 at 2:11 am in reply to: Applying Kona to a 23.98 project

    If I put 26:46:00 into 23.98 non-drop and switch to 29.97 drop I get a few minutes different, and the same if I put 26:46:00 into 29.97 and change to 23.98 non-drop. The difference I’m seeing is a few seconds at most not minutes.

    jmf

  • Jack Fox

    January 29, 2009 at 2:05 am in reply to: Applying Kona to a 23.98 project

    If 23.98 is non-drop only, why does the calculator you recommend have a “23.98 drop” frame option?

    jmf

Page 1 of 17

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy