Hiostt
Forum Replies Created
-
Hiostt
July 7, 2007 at 6:09 pm in reply to: Why 720×576 PAL miniDV footage needs to be 768×576 in AE?Ok, thanks for your time Steve!
-
Hiostt
July 7, 2007 at 5:34 pm in reply to: Why 720×576 PAL miniDV footage needs to be 768×576 in AE?Ok.
“You may have to reduce the final movie to 320×240 for quicker download and easier playback.”
I was planning to reduce it to 384×288. Thats perfect half from 768×576. Is there difference if I resize it like that?
“If the footage is interlaced, you *must* separate fields (file>interpret footage>main, separate fields>lower field first) for the internet.”
My footage is progressive so I need to change this to “off”, am I right?
-
Hiostt
July 7, 2007 at 1:58 pm in reply to: Why 720×576 PAL miniDV footage needs to be 768×576 in AE?No, composition setting is PAL DV (1,07). The same what the video is. But it dont look right with that setting in computer where the final exported video goes. I think I have to change to 768×576 and Square Pixels so the video looks right in computer screen.
-
Hiostt
July 7, 2007 at 12:56 pm in reply to: Why 720×576 PAL miniDV footage needs to be 768×576 in AE?I meant that the video looks normal in Premiere (in the first post).
I’m going to put the final video to internet. So I should change composition to 768×576 and Square Pixels like I did?
-
Hiostt
July 7, 2007 at 2:10 am in reply to: Why 720×576 PAL miniDV footage needs to be 768×576 in AE?I just read the help and it says:
“if a file uses nonsquare pixels, After Effects displays the pixel aspect ratio next to the file
-
Hiostt
July 7, 2007 at 1:48 am in reply to: Why 720×576 PAL miniDV footage needs to be 768×576 in AE?No but I checked “Toggle pixel aspect ratio correction” box and that didnt help… but changing composition to 768×576 and also changing Pixel Aspect Ratio in Composition settings from DV PAL (1,07) to Square Pixels worked. Should I do it different way?
-
I also made 12fps, 13fps and 15fps versions and they looked very bad. I have to go with 25fps.
-
I made little tests and this is what I got.
Both are using QuickTime H.264, full resolution, best quality settings. First one is Exported and second one is Rendered:
https://koti.tnnet.fi/hiost/e.jpg
So in this case exported looks way better. Also the file size is smaller in exported video. Exported 10,2mb rendered 12,6mb.
-
15fps? We shot in 25fps progressive mode with Panasonic DVX100. So it wont change the look of the motion in the video?
Do you need to install some codec so you can watch H.264 videos? If yes, I think flash would be better then. Not everyone want or can install extra stuff to their computers…
Noob question, you render through “composition -> make movie…”?
I will render with AE and also with Super and compare the results.
Thanks for your quick answers.
-
Yeah something like the first one without text, numbers and clear shapes (like those cirles). Do you know any tutorials how to do those? I will try to search them with google…