[Bill Davis] “Voice One: See – Final Cut Pro X is just too different for me to learn and use.
Voice Two: See – Every OTHER software also does everything that X can do!”
Apparently Bill, your hearing voices. You might want to have that checked out.
But if your referring to my post, I will try to make it clear enough for you to understand without the aid of voices. It is my contention that you can do the same things, although not with the same tools, with all modern NLE software, which is why they all earn the sobriquet “Pro” – Avid, Edius, Vegas, Ppro, FCPX, FCP 7, Lightworks – you could cut a feature or any other type of media with any of them. Each would have strengths and weaknesses that differ from the others, and it is in matching those strengths to an editor’s own workflow preferences that choice is found.
As to why I don’t personally use FCPX, the answer is the same as for Vegas or Lightworks – at the moment I don’t see a compelling reason to switch. There’s nothing you’ve ever described with X that makes me want to invest the time and energy – other than Audtions, which alone is still not enough. It doesn’t sound, from all the descriptions I’ve heard, that it suits my personal editing preferences. Neither does Avid by the way, and at least there I do have compelling professional reasons to learn it. Still I’ve avoided Avid for the past 20 years – a mere 5 years of avoiding FCPX is just a trifle compared to that.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin’ attached to nothin’
“Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf