[Hector Berrebi]

you could try and play with source settings (right click a clip in the bin)
will only work for QT files that are NOT avid codecs. and were AMA linked.

won’t fix your problem, for that you’ll have to get an IO card and monitor

however, it will let you expand the range back to 0 & 255

you can always change it back and refresh source setting on sequence before you export

hector

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

bump…

anyone else got this?

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

did you try the relink option?

right-click your sequence and select relink.
make sure the bin with linked master clips is open too
in the relink window uncheck “match case …” and check “allow relinking of AMA…”

hope this helps

hector

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Jacob Lanum] “one thing i’m thinking about is exporting videos with an Alpha channel.”

avid’s DNXHD codec family supports alpha channels

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Mike Most] “No, if you do the math, it is approximately 2.5:1. Uncompressed HD is approx. 1.2 gigabits per second. The 440Mb rate is essentially identical to HDCam SR, and identical to the SR Master format Sony is offering with the F65.
“

oh… cool, so its 444 Mbs… slightly more beefed up than Prores and matches HDCAM SR.

Mike, where was this published?

hector

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Job ter Burg] “P.S.: They don’t label it as DNxHD. It is labeled “1:1”.
“

then why make a big deal of it and publish as a new feature?

rgb 4:4:4 1:1 has been around for a while

https://www.avid.com/us/products/media-composer?intcmp=AV-HP-S2

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Job ter Burg] “Pretty sure it’s uncompressed 4:4:4 RGB.
“

you’re right, i was calculating for 60P not i

but if its uncompressed… why is it DNX? and how is it different from what’s currently available?

i’m still betting in the area of 2:1

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Shane Ross] “, then use Adobe Premiere Pro”

🙂 kind of hard, they’re Avid students in an Avid course

instead they learn the good old values of transcoding, and working with a unifying codec like DNX.

if only Avid found their way to mercury-engine-up stuff

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Shane Ross] “AMA is a LOT more stable. Works great with many formats…improved performance with a lot. But not DSLR. H.264 is just a bear of a codec. Get out of it when you can.
“

damn DSLR codec…
i always tell my students when they complain against Avid, to first blame their expectations that working with a cheap video-like camera would be a smooth ride, second blame Canon for choosing such a lousy implementation of the codec, and last blame avid… or any software for not doing enough..

and yet… disappointing to hear that the new version with 64 bit support still chokes on 264…

BTW… really good review Shane 🙂

thanks

hector

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting

[Hector Berrebi]

[Steve Connor] ”
I’ve edited a few 3D shows in FCP7 with the Dashwood plugin, which is also available for FCPX now. If the footage is well shot and the stereographer has done his job, then post in 3D is not particularly difficult.
“

i second that… Dashwood tools make post in 3D exceptionally smooth if footage was properly shot.

i hope MC6 tools will be as cool and fun to work with

does Dashwood offers an Avid plugin? would be nice if they do…

hector

Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting