Ultimatly, the client calls it and if there is time and money being waisted arguing about it between editor and audio dude, they’ll bail and go get it done some place it’s not so hard to do it at. If your sound designer is sticking his chest out on the edit, you may have to replace him with somone that actually adds to the mix, no pun intended. His job is to enhance, not reinvent. I have had audio dudes come in the edit suite (with the client in the room) with a “did you change the timing on what I already did!?” uhm yeah, it’s called editing. shew.
This is a big reason I like to just handle everything myself. Quicker, easier, better. Most places that have this done in one room, that done in another and even another thing done in another are not doing because it’s efficient or because it provides a better product in the end. It’s because it’s the opposite of efficient and billing 3 rooms at once for a longer amount of time than it should take makes em a bigger dollar per project. Not bad if it’s an ad agency never seeing that client again but ya gotta be on the level to have repeat business.
The editor drives the boat in an edit session. Thats his gig. He/she is to ensure the final product is the absolute best it can be with the elements/budget provided. If a team member aiding them is not actually doing that, they are of no use.
