People are impassioned about their choices and that’s a good thing. Our main job as editors is to elicit emotional responses from those who view the stories we cut together. And so it’s fitting that the viewpoints on which equipment we prefer to use to create those stories would be equally filled with emotion.
Just to round out the discussion a bit. I’ve learned FCPX and I’ve done several projects with it and I also like it quite a bit. I also agree that it can be a tool that will increase an editor’s efficiency. In an ever-changing market, adaptability is key. However, most of my work is being created with Adobe Premiere.
Market forces usually dictate what software will be used. When Avid dominated the market, a large percentage of editors were Avid proficient. Then FCP came onto the scene, it cut dramatically into the Avid market and consequently we had FCP editors as the norm. So in the last several years Apple re-invented FCP and that coincided with alienating a sizable percentage of it’s professional user base. Seeing an opening in the market, Adobe jumped in and seriously beefed up it’s product line. So now we have a lot of editors who are committed to the Adobe cloud.
If any of the numbers released by Apple and Adobe are to be believed, Adobe has anywhere from a 2 to 1 to 10 to 1 dominance in the market. The actual numbers though are irrelevant.
The deciding factor for freelancers will usually be what systems they need to know in order to gain employment. And of course, it’ll vary from market to market.