Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 2
  • Gene Limbrick

    January 10, 2011 at 10:44 am in reply to: Am I crazy for thinking about a Hackintosh?

    I built one, using tonymac86’s website as a guide. i5 processor with a pretty sweet gfx card, it runs OSX fine, and i’ve haven’t had FCP or after effects crash yet, but i only use this for personal projects, if i was a freelance editor i would maybe rent/borrow a machine for my first few jobs until i could afford a mac pro, it’s tricky though.

  • Gene Limbrick

    January 10, 2011 at 10:39 am in reply to: replace timecode on file, necessary?

    Well we’re capturing whole tapes, so if we recaptured the tape from the very beginning again, then stripped the timecode again, and re-linked, wouldn’t that work? we’re not really capturing this footage for editing, it’s more archival.

  • Gene Limbrick

    January 7, 2011 at 5:24 pm in reply to: replace timecode on file, necessary?

    We cant capture without deck control as the tapes are usually an hour long, so we leave them running. without deck control the files will just have tons of black on the the ends. i’ll have to see if anyone knows a bulk way of stripping video files of timecode.

  • Gene Limbrick

    December 23, 2010 at 10:04 am in reply to: 60i to 50i, overcrank?

    it doesn’t need to be slower, i can slow it down after in final cut, but if i can get it to play at 25fps then i won’t get the stuttery pull down effect (i assume that’s what i’m seeing) when slowing the 60i footage down in the 50i timeline.

    thanks

  • Gene Limbrick

    November 30, 2010 at 11:40 am in reply to: strange deinterlacing issue

    Sorry, i also forgot to mention that i’m slowing the clips down too, to around 60%

  • Gene Limbrick

    October 11, 2010 at 2:21 pm in reply to: 3000 hours of Beta SP, best way to capture?

    Hey,

    Just came back to this thread, as we’re still facing this problem, im from the same company as OP

    It’s an archive of 30 years, going back, from our production company’s shoots.

    Im thinking dv50. As far as I know, we’ll only ever need to edit on mac, and we’re capturing through a blackmagic card. Our options are only dv50, jpeg, pro res and uncompressed. uncompressed is out of the question. by eye dv50 looks better in final cut, though i’m waiting on getting our monitor sorted out to se it properly.

    this will take more than a year, this we have accepted…

  • Gene Limbrick

    September 10, 2010 at 5:11 pm in reply to: text pixelates when zoomed

    “When it gets stretched and moved by the tracking data part of the text falls out of the frame and disappears.”

    it seems to track very strangely and then the edges disappear after a certain invisible line…

  • Gene Limbrick

    September 10, 2010 at 5:08 pm in reply to: text pixelates when zoomed

    doubling the resolution within the text comp halves the size of the text inside the text comp, but when i go back to the main comp it’s the same size as before, except the tracking is slightly off…

    this doesnt make sense…

  • Gene Limbrick

    September 10, 2010 at 4:59 pm in reply to: text pixelates when zoomed

    I have to pre-comp as when you make a text layer it seems to inherit the current comp size as a “frame”

    When it gets stretched and moved by the tracking data part of the text falls out of the frame and disappears.

    I think i’ve tried what you said with making a seperate comp from scratch in a larger size, filling it with text and then putting that comp into the composition. when i apply the tracking data to this text comp it disappears…

    let me know if i’ve misunderstood..

  • Gene Limbrick

    August 6, 2010 at 9:34 am in reply to: exporting 16:9 to 4:3, changes masks on export!?

    If i nest the 1st sequence in a new 4:3 sequence I have the same problem, and if i copy and paste the clips across they come in at the wrong size, and will take hours of resizing…. damnit

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy