[Jason Roberts] “Your assumption, based on one post which I talked about Deakins in a particular way and the statements you made based on my (admitted) ranting on a bad day, are both specious and unfounded.”
I went back and re-read your post and my opinion still stands. The attitude that it represents is one that grates on me (you having a “bad day” notwithstanding) and frankly, as a DP, having someone say to me:
Roger Deakins never shoots anamorphic and basically uses only three lenses (32, 40 & 50 – that’s by his own admission on his discussion board) shooting on standard 35mm film
would instantly make me discount their opinion on further matters. That you actually expressed this verbally to the DP blows my mind.
[Jason Roberts] “you know nothing of me, my background or training”
But what you say and how you have chosen to express what I have picked up specifically indicates that you’ve watched some interviews and read a lot, but have no practical experience outside of knowing some technical stuff and what other DPs do on a superficial level.
[Jason Roberts] “Sir, you owe me an apology for your first statement.”
Get over yourself.
[Jason Roberts] “someone like him is a master, I consider one of the best working today, and should be studied.”
He’s just the fad name (not that he isn’t good at what he does), and it’s telling that out of all the names you’ve dropped, his is the only actual DP name, and the only DP you’ve named out of referencing anyone in your last post. Frankly, I find Dariusz Wolski to be better, given what he’s done with the Red Epic MX in Prometheus (one of the best looking live-action 3D films I have seen to date), Emmanuel Lubezki with Tree of Life (that everyone agreed was a tremendous cinematography reel even if they didn’t like it as a movie), and Hoyte Hoytema replacing Deakins on Spectre (after amazing work on Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Her, and Intersteller)
What if Spectre looks even better than Skyfall? It could.